BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25652380)

  • 1. [Wiltse approach versus the conventional posterior midline approach for lumbar degenerative diseases: a metaanalysis].
    Ran B; Yan L; Cai L
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jan; 40(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 25652380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lan T; Hu SY; Zhang YT; Zheng YC; Zhang R; Shen Z; Yang XJ
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():86-93. PubMed ID: 29367001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kunder SL; van Kuijk SMJ; Rijkers K; Caelers IJMH; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study of a New Retractor-Assisted WILTSE TLIF, MIS-TLIF, and Traditional PLIF for Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Liu H; Li J; Sun Y; Wang X; Wang W; Guo L; Zhang F; Zhang P; Zhang W
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Jul; 14(7):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 35603557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF): a Meta analysis].
    Gao ZY; Qin J; Kang J; Song H; He XJ; Li HP; Wang D
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2016 Oct; 29(10):954-962. PubMed ID: 29285916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
    Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of posterior lumbar nonfusion surgery with isobar devices versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery on clinical and radiological features in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Guan J; Liu T; Li W; Zhao H; Yang K; Li C; Feng N; Jiang G; Yang Y; Yu X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 17(1):116. PubMed ID: 35189915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.
    Lin Y; Chen W; Chen A; Li F
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26091113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total and hidden blood loss between open posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by Wiltse approach.
    Lei F; Li Z; He W; Tian X; Zheng L; Kang J; Feng D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(20):e19864. PubMed ID: 32443290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interspinous spacers versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Cai Y; Luo J; Huang J; Lian C; Zhou H; Yao H; Su P
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1135-42. PubMed ID: 26907877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.