These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25652696)

  • 1. Understanding Clinicians' Use of Cues When Assessing the Future Risk of Violence: A Clinical Judgement Analysis in the Psychiatric Setting.
    Brown B; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 25652696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.
    Odeh MS; Zeiss RA; Huss MT
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16557618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing risk and prioritizing referral for self-harm: when and why is my judgement different from yours?
    Cahill S; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2012 Sep; 19(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 21594954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the "actuarial versus clinical" assessment debate.
    Buchanan A
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Feb; 59(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18245161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
    Carroll A
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 41(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 17464716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk communication: clinicians' reported approaches and perceived values.
    Heilbrun K; Philipson J; Berman L; Warren J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 10509939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of violence risk in 440 psychiatric patients in China: examining the feasibility and acceptability of a novel and scalable approach (FoVOx).
    Zhong S; Yu R; Cornish R; Wang X; Fazel S;
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Mar; 21(1):120. PubMed ID: 33653305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of peripheral message cues on clinicians' judgments about clients' psychological status.
    Brewer N; Barnes J; Sauer J
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 21332521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.
    Abidin Z; Davoren M; Naughton L; Gibbons O; Nulty A; Kennedy HG
    BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Jul; 13():197. PubMed ID: 23890106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Judging a book by its cover': An experimental study of the negative impact of a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder on clinicians' judgements of uncomplicated panic disorder.
    Lam DC; Salkovskis PM; Hogg LI
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2016 Sep; 55(3):253-68. PubMed ID: 26212734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 25496088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.
    Steadman HJ; Silver E; Monahan J; Appelbaum PS; Robbins PC; Mulvey EP; Grisso T; Roth LH; Banks S
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Feb; 24(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 10693320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multirater reliability of the historical, clinical, and risk management-20.
    Penney SR; McMaster R; Wilkie T
    Assessment; 2014 Feb; 21(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24343237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preventing the unpredicted: managing violence risk in mental health care.
    Swanson JW
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Feb; 59(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 18245162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Patients in forensic and general psychiatry. Do risk assessment measures detect differing risks of future violence?].
    Lincoln TM; Hodgins S; Jöckel D; Freese R; Born P; Eucker S; Schmidt P; Gretenkord L; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 2006 May; 77(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 15944853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A; Mohíno Justes S; Gómez-Durán EL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of aggression in inpatient settings.
    McDermott BE; Holoyda BJ
    CNS Spectr; 2014 Oct; 19(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 25296966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security.
    Hilton NZ; Simmons JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Aug; 25(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 11501440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.
    Zoe Hilton N; Carter AM; Harris GT; Sharpe AJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Feb; 23(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 18162635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.