378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25652734)
1. Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects.
Huang AJ; Chang CY; Thomas BJ; MacMahon PJ; Palmer WE
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):797-809. PubMed ID: 25652734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma.
Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Singer G; Riccabona M; Sorantin E
Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(12):1939-1949. PubMed ID: 32535775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twin Robotic X-Ray System for 3D Cone-Beam CT of the Wrist: An Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.
Grunz JP; Gietzen CH; Kunz AS; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Bley TA; Schmitt R; Gassenmaier T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):422-427. PubMed ID: 31799871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study.
Almashraqi AA; Ahmed EA; Mohamed NS; Barngkgei IH; Elsherbini NA; Halboub ES
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20160323. PubMed ID: 28266870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose reduction in cone-beam computed tomography of extremities: evaluation of a novel radiation shield.
Matikka H; Virén T
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Jun; 34(2):N57-63. PubMed ID: 24894593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multidetector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Fractures of Adult Cadaveric Wrists.
Neubauer J; Benndorf M; Reidelbach C; Krauß T; Lampert F; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Goerke SM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164859. PubMed ID: 27788215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metallic artifacts from internal scaphoid fracture fixation screws: comparison between C-arm flat-panel, cone-beam, and multidetector computed tomography.
Finkenstaedt T; Morsbach F; Calcagni M; Vich M; Pfirrmann CW; Alkadhi H; Runge VM; Andreisek G; Guggenberger R
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):532-9. PubMed ID: 24691141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial Clinical Experience With Extremity Cone-Beam CT of the Foot and Ankle in Pediatric Patients.
Pugmire BS; Shailam R; Sagar P; Liu B; Li X; Palmer WE; Huang AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 26797374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of effective doses from MDCT and CBCT imaging of extremities.
Ludlow JB; Johnson BK; Ivanovic M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 30255853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between cone-beam CT technique and diagnostic usefulness in patients undergoing embolotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Gutierrez D; Gurajala RK; Kapoor B; Setser R; Karuppasamy K
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):993.e1-993.e6. PubMed ID: 28705329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of introducing extremity cone-beam CT in an emergency radiology department: A population-based study.
Jacques T; Morel V; Dartus J; Badr S; Demondion X; Cotten A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 107(2):102834. PubMed ID: 33524633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography.
Brisco J; Fuller K; Lee N; Andrew D
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 52(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24139635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications.
Yu L; Vrieze TJ; Bruesewitz MR; Kofler JM; DeLone DR; Pallanch JF; Lindell EP; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W193-201. PubMed ID: 20093573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A dose-neutral image quality comparison of different CBCT and CT systems using paranasal sinus imaging protocols and phantoms.
Ronkainen AP; Al-Gburi A; Liimatainen T; Matikka H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4407-4414. PubMed ID: 35084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
