These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25652839)

  • 1. Experimental manipulation of avian social structure reveals segregation is carried over across contexts.
    Firth JA; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Mar; 282(1802):. PubMed ID: 25652839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathways of information transmission among wild songbirds follow experimentally imposed changes in social foraging structure.
    Firth JA; Sheldon BC; Farine DR
    Biol Lett; 2016 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 27247439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social carry-over effects underpin trans-seasonally linked structure in a wild bird population.
    Firth JA; Sheldon BC
    Ecol Lett; 2016 Nov; 19(11):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 27623746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost of prospecting for dispersal opportunities in a social bird.
    Kingma SA; Komdeur J; Hammers M; Richardson DS
    Biol Lett; 2016 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 27330175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wild birds respond to flockmate loss by increasing their social network associations to others.
    Firth JA; Voelkl B; Crates RA; Aplin LM; Biro D; Croft DP; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 May; 284(1854):. PubMed ID: 28515203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major).
    Aplin LM; Farine DR; Morand-Ferron J; Cole EF; Cockburn A; Sheldon BC
    Ecol Lett; 2013 Nov; 16(11):1365-72. PubMed ID: 24047530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social dynamics of core members in mixed-species bird flocks change across a gradient of foraging habitat quality.
    Gentry Richardson KE; Roche DP; Mugel SG; Lancaster ND; Sieving KE; Freeberg TM; Lucas JR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262385. PubMed ID: 35108278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foraging networks and social tolerance in a cooperatively breeding primate (Callithrix jacchus).
    De la Fuente MF; Sueur C; Garber PA; Bicca-Marques JC; Souto A; Schiel N
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jan; 91(1):138-153. PubMed ID: 34655252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds.
    Aplin LM; Farine DR; Morand-Ferron J; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Oct; 279(1745):4199-205. PubMed ID: 22915668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.
    Aplin LM; Farine DR; Mann RP; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20141016. PubMed ID: 24990682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning the ecological niche.
    Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jan; 274(1606):19-23. PubMed ID: 17015332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistent sociality but flexible social associations across temporal and spatial foraging contexts in a colonial breeder.
    Jones TB; Green JA; Patrick SC; Evans JC; Wells MR; Rodríguez-Malagón MA; Arnould JPY
    Ecol Lett; 2020 Jul; 23(7):1085-1096. PubMed ID: 32314533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal evidence for the adaptive benefits of social foraging in the wild.
    Snijders L; Krause S; Tump AN; Breuker M; Ortiz C; Rizzi S; Ramnarine IW; Krause J; Kurvers RHJM
    Commun Biol; 2021 Jan; 4(1):94. PubMed ID: 33473153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection for territory acquisition is modulated by social network structure in a wild songbird.
    Farine DR; Sheldon BC
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 25611344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-photoperiodic factors and timing of breeding in blue tits: impact of environmental and social influences in semi-natural conditions.
    Caro SP; Lambrechts MM; Balthazart J; Perret P
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17368964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Group display in the socially monogamous Northern Double-collared Sunbird (Cinnyris reichenowi).
    Riegert J; Antczak M; Fainová D; Blažková P
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():138-44. PubMed ID: 24345518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social and spatial effects on genetic variation between foraging flocks in a wild bird population.
    Radersma R; Garroway CJ; Santure AW; de Cauwer I; Farine DR; Slate J; Sheldon BC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(20):5807-5819. PubMed ID: 28792645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity patterns during food provisioning are affected by artificial light in free living great tits (Parus major).
    Titulaer M; Spoelstra K; Lange CY; Visser ME
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37377. PubMed ID: 22624023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enduring rules of care within pairs - how blue tit parents resume provisioning behaviour after experimental disturbance.
    Iserbyt A; Griffioen M; Eens M; Müller W
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2776. PubMed ID: 30808890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.