339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25652973)
1. Obama seeks science boost.
Deng B; Monastersky R; Morello L; Reardon S; Tollefson J
Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7537):13-5. PubMed ID: 25652973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Trump budget would slash science programmes across government.
Reardon S; Tollefson J; Witze A; Ross E
Nature; 2017 May; 546(7656):19-20. PubMed ID: 28569829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US science faces a squeeze.
Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Samuel Reich E
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):146-7. PubMed ID: 21068799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. budget. Science spared from domestic spending freeze--for now.
Mervis J
Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5966):628-30. PubMed ID: 20133540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Obama shoots for science increase.
Semeniuk I; Wadman M; Young S; Hand E; Reich ES; Monastersky R
Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7385):283-5. PubMed ID: 22337024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trump science budget sows confusion.
Morello L; Guglielmi G; Reardon S; Tollefson J; Witze A
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7692):284-285. PubMed ID: 29446392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science policy. 2005 budget makes flat a virtue.
Malakoff D
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):748-50. PubMed ID: 14764844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Obama budget backs basic science.
Fang J; Hand E; Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Waldrop M
Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):594-5. PubMed ID: 20130620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US science agencies face deep cuts in Trump budget.
Reardon S; Tollefson J; Witze A; Ross E
Nature; 2017 Mar; 543(7646):471-472. PubMed ID: 28332539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Obama resists research cuts.
Semeniuk I; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Mann A; Dickey Zakaib G
Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7334):313-5. PubMed ID: 21331013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 2003 budget. War effort shapes U.S. budget, with some program casualties.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5557):952-4. PubMed ID: 11834796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomedicine wins big in US budget deal.
Reardon S; Cesare C; Ledford H
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):446. PubMed ID: 26701033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High stakes for US science.
Tollefson J; Ledford H
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):453-5. PubMed ID: 23099376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US science: The Obama experiment.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):488-92. PubMed ID: 23018946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US midterm elections offer little hope for science.
Morello L
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7523):412-3. PubMed ID: 25341766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science policy. Highlights from the budget.
Kaiser J; Malakoff D; Stokstad ; Siefe C
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):749. PubMed ID: 14764845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
Wolinetz CD
Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US science agencies face budget limbo.
Reardon S
Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7619):149. PubMed ID: 27604930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. budget. Democratic Congress begins to put its stamp on science.
Kintisch E
Science; 2007 Jun; 316(5833):1828-9. PubMed ID: 17600191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
Mervis J
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
