These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25653611)

  • 1. Causal reasoning with forces.
    Wolff P; Barbey AK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():1. PubMed ID: 25653611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning about causes from people and about people as causes: probabilistic models and social causal reasoning.
    Buchsbaum D; Seiver E; Bridgers S; Gopnik A
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():125-60. PubMed ID: 23205410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries.
    Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):180-226. PubMed ID: 16678145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond Markov: Accounting for independence violations in causal reasoning.
    Rehder B
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():42-84. PubMed ID: 29522980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. For want of a nail: How absences cause events.
    Wolff P; Barbey AK; Hausknecht M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):191-221. PubMed ID: 20438249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Much Ado About Nothing: The Mental Representation of Omissive Relations.
    Khemlani S; Bello P; Briggs G; Harner H; Wasylyshyn C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():609658. PubMed ID: 33613364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualizing causal semantics using animations.
    Kadaba N; Irani P; Leboe J
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(6):1254-61. PubMed ID: 17968072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanistic beliefs determine adherence to the Markov property in causal reasoning.
    Park J; Sloman SA
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):186-216. PubMed ID: 24152569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios.
    Rehder B; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):245-260. PubMed ID: 27826953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Associative learning or Bayesian inference? Revisiting backwards blocking reasoning in adults.
    Benton DT; Rakison DH
    Cognition; 2023 Dec; 241():105626. PubMed ID: 37769519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal relations and feature similarity in children's inductive reasoning.
    Hayes BK; Thompson SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):470-84. PubMed ID: 17696694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How Do People Generalize Causal Relations over Objects? A Non-parametric Bayesian Account.
    Zhao B; Lucas CG; Bramley NR
    Comput Brain Behav; 2022; 5(1):22-44. PubMed ID: 34870096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal reasoning without mechanism.
    Dündar-Coecke S; Goldin G; Sloman SA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268219. PubMed ID: 35560140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using unobserved causes to explain unexpected outcomes: The effect of existing causal knowledge on protection from extinction by a hidden cause.
    Chow JYL; Lee JC; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38095948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Betting on transitivity in probabilistic causal chains.
    Hebbelmann D; von Sydow M
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):505-519. PubMed ID: 28612081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():12-38. PubMed ID: 26010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments.
    Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105167. PubMed ID: 35660345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two heads are better than one, but how much? Evidence that people's use of causal integration rules does not always conform to normative standards.
    Vadillo MA; Ortega-Castro N; Barberia I; Baker AG
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(5):356-67. PubMed ID: 24614872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.