BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25654668)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
    Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
    Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Enterography for Active Inflammatory Terminal Ileal Crohn Disease: Comparison of Full-Dose and Half-Dose Images Reconstructed with FBP and Half-Dose Images with SAFIRE.
    Gandhi NS; Baker ME; Goenka AH; Bullen JA; Obuchowski NA; Remer EM; Coppa CP; Einstein D; Feldman MK; Kanmaniraja D; Purysko AS; Vahdat N; Primak AN; Karim W; Herts BR
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 27077382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
    van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography.
    Yu S; Zhang L; Zheng J; Xu Y; Chen Y; Song Z
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):96.e1-96.e6. PubMed ID: 27647546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Kambadakone AR; Chaudhary NA; Desai GS; Nguyen DD; Kulkarni NM; Sahani DV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W743-52. PubMed ID: 21606263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
    Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
    Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT enterography at 80 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus at 120 kVp with standard reconstruction: image quality, diagnostic adequacy, and dose reduction.
    Kaza RK; Platt JF; Al-Hawary MM; Wasnik A; Liu PS; Pandya A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 22528897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Hur BY; Baek J; Shim H; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1843-52. PubMed ID: 25526686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go?
    Kulkarni NM; Uppot RN; Eisner BH; Sahani DV
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 22891359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease.
    Lee SJ; Park SH; Kim AY; Yang SK; Yun SC; Lee SS; Jung GS; Ha HK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21701010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.