193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25654748)
1. Auditory selective attention is enhanced by a task-irrelevant temporally coherent visual stimulus in human listeners.
Maddox RK; Atilgan H; Bizley JK; Lee AK
Elife; 2015 Feb; 4():. PubMed ID: 25654748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociable Neural Correlates of Multisensory Coherence and Selective Attention.
Peng F; Bizley JK; Schnupp JW; Auksztulewicz R
J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(25):4697-4708. PubMed ID: 37221094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Training enhances the ability of listeners to exploit visual information for auditory scene analysis.
Atilgan H; Bizley JK
Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104529. PubMed ID: 33373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of Visual Information in Auditory Cortex Promotes Auditory Scene Analysis through Multisensory Binding.
Atilgan H; Town SM; Wood KC; Jones GP; Maddox RK; Lee AKC; Bizley JK
Neuron; 2018 Feb; 97(3):640-655.e4. PubMed ID: 29395914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.
Donohue SE; Roberts KC; Grent-'t-Jong T; Woldorff MG
J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(22):7982-90. PubMed ID: 21632920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.
Xia J; Zhang W; Jiang Y; Li Y; Chen Q
Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():47-64. PubMed ID: 29864595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating Visual Information into the Auditory Cortex Promotes Sound Discrimination through Choice-Related Multisensory Integration.
Chang S; Xu J; Zheng M; Keniston L; Zhou X; Zhang J; Yu L
J Neurosci; 2022 Nov; 42(45):8556-8568. PubMed ID: 36150889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermodal attention affects the processing of the temporal alignment of audiovisual stimuli.
Talsma D; Senkowski D; Woldorff MG
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 198(2-3):313-28. PubMed ID: 19495733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parallel perceptual enhancement and hierarchic relevance evaluation in an audio-visual conjunction task.
Potts GF; Wood SM; Kothmann D; Martin LE
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():126-39. PubMed ID: 18723003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.
Li B; Parmentier FB; Zhang M
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 23628699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech.
Jesse A; Kaplan E
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated sounds.
Ciaramitaro VM; Chow HM; Eglington LG
J Vis; 2017 Mar; 17(3):20. PubMed ID: 28355632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nothing is irrelevant in a noisy world: sensory illusions reveal obligatory within-and across-modality integration.
Bizley JK; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Lee AK
J Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 32(39):13402-10. PubMed ID: 23015431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party.
Har-Shai Yahav P; Zion Golumbic E
Elife; 2021 May; 10():. PubMed ID: 33942722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.
Maddox RK; Shinn-Cunningham BG
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 22124889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
