162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25655134)
1. Changes in children's speech discrimination and spatial release from masking between 2 and 4 years after sequential cochlear implantation.
Killan CF; Killan EC; Raine CH
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 25655134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Outcome of the Second Implant and Long-Term Use.
Myhrum M; Strøm-Roum H; Heldahl MG; Rødvik AK; Eksveen B; Landsvik B; Rasmussen K; Tvete OE
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 27828788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.
Geißler G; Arweiler I; Hehrmann P; Lenarz T; Hamacher V; Büchner A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 24993633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Gorospe JM; Ruiz SSC; Benito F; Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():134-137. PubMed ID: 28188882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial Release From Masking in 2-Year-Olds With Normal Hearing and With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Hess CL; Misurelli SM; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775567. PubMed ID: 29761735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolated Second Implant Adaptation Period in Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults.
Smilsky K; Dixon PR; Smith L; Shipp D; Ng A; Millman T; Stewart S; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY; Chen JM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e274-e281. PubMed ID: 28806338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral project: Demographics and results of localization and speech perception testing.
Cullington HE; Bele D; Brinton JC; Cooper S; Daft M; Harding J; Hatton N; Humphries J; Lutman ME; Maddocks J; Maggs J; Millward K; O'Donoghue G; Patel S; Rajput K; Salmon V; Sear T; Speers A; Wheeler A; Wilson K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2-22. PubMed ID: 28010679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech detection in noise and spatial unmasking in children with simultaneous versus sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Chadha NK; Papsin BC; Jiwani S; Gordon KA
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1057-64. PubMed ID: 21725259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in the adolescent population.
Friedmann DR; Green J; Fang Y; Ensor K; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25946482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral cochlear implants in children with sequential surgery.
Strøm-Roum H; Laurent C; Wie OB
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 76(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 22075133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Bilateral Experience Lead to Improved Spatial Unmasking of Speech in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants?
Litovsky RY; Misurelli SM
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e35-42. PubMed ID: 26756153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
