342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25655682)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted vs. conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: single-institution, matched cohort comparison.
Kim EH; Vemana G; Johnson MH; Vetter JM; Rensing AJ; Strother MC; Fowler KJ; Andriole GL
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25655682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging‑directed biopsy improves the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness compared with a 12‑core transrectal ultrasound‑guided prostate biopsy.
Zhang J; Xiu J; Dong Y; Wang M; Han X; Qin Y; Huang Z; Cai S; Yuan X; Liu Q
Mol Med Rep; 2014 May; 9(5):1989-97. PubMed ID: 24584266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Hoeks C; Bouwense SA; Huisman H; Yakar D; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 20006859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
Mozer P; Rouprêt M; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; de Gorski A; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24552477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Software-assisted Systematic Biopsy Using MR/US Fusion in Patients With Negative Prostate MRI.
Meng Y; Vetter JM; Parker AA; Arett CT; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Fowler KJ; Kim EH
Urology; 2018 Oct; 120():162-166. PubMed ID: 29958965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results.
Abdi H; Zargar H; Goldenberg SL; Walshe T; Pourmalek F; Eddy C; Chang SD; Gleave ME; Harris AC; So AI; Machan L; Black PC
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):165.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25665509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate.
Oberlin DT; Casalino DD; Miller FH; Matulewicz RS; Perry KT; Nadler RB; Kundu S; Catalona WJ; Meeks JJ
Urology; 2016 Jun; 92():75-9. PubMed ID: 26966043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
