122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25656660)
21. Incidentally detected lesions on contrast-enhanced MR imaging in candidates for breast-conserving therapy: correlation between MR findings and histological diagnosis.
Yabuuchi H; Kuroiwa T; Kusumoto C; Fukuya T; Ohno S; Hachitanda Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16521096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benign (BI-RADS 2) lesions in breast MRI.
Spick C; Szolar DH; Tillich M; Reittner P; Preidler KW; Baltzer PA
Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 25649442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MRI features of stromal fibrosis of the breast with histopathologic correlation.
Lee SJ; Mahoney MC; Khan S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):755-62. PubMed ID: 21862821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement.
van de Ven SM; Lin MC; Daniel BL; Sareen P; Lipson JA; Pal S; Dirbas FM; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 20575077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates.
Pediconi F; Miglio E; Telesca M; Luciani ML; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 21934515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Incidental hepatic lesions detected on breast MRI: Rate of malignancy and implications for utilization.
Shah PK; Kafer IA; Grimaldi GM
Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():93-97. PubMed ID: 29452924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging in men: preliminary results.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Schild HH; Leutner CC; von Falkenhausen M; Lutterbey G; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 16371581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography.
Nakano S; Kousaka J; Fujii K; Yorozuya K; Yoshida M; Mouri Y; Akizuki M; Tetsuka R; Ando T; Fukutomi T; Oshima Y; Kimura J; Ishiguchi T; Arai O
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):1179-88. PubMed ID: 22821400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidental liver lesions seen on Breast MRI: When is additional imaging warranted?
Knox M; Slanetz P; Phillips J; Fein Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta T
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():319-324. PubMed ID: 28987687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome of high-risk lesions at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum- assisted breast biopsy.
Heller SL; Elias K; Gupta A; Greenwood HI; Mercado CL; Moy L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):237-45. PubMed ID: 24370150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.
Baltzer PA; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1658-63. PubMed ID: 20489110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidental pleural effusions detected on screening breast MRI.
Nguyen J; Nicholson BT; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):W142-5. PubMed ID: 22733923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging at 3 T for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Gruber S; Debski BK; Pinker K; Chmelik M; Grabner G; Helbich T; Trattnig S; Bogner W
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):752-61. PubMed ID: 21998046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer detected on an incident (second or subsequent) round of screening MRI: MRI features of false-negative cases.
Yamaguchi K; Schacht D; Newstead GM; Bradbury AR; Verp MS; Olopade OI; Abe H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 24147491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with occult breast carcinoma: evaluation on feasibility and correlation with histopathological findings.
Lu H; Xu YL; Zhang SP; Lang RG; Zee CS; Liu PF; Fu L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jun; 124(12):1790-5. PubMed ID: 21740834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
