These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25657316)

  • 41. The one-stop shop offering both coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion: may well be opening soon, around the corner.
    Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1112-4. PubMed ID: 23153910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fractional flow reserve: concepts, applications and use in France in 2010.
    Puymirat É; Muller O; Sharif F; Dupouy P; Cuisset T; de Bruyne B; Gilard M
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2010; 103(11-12):615-22. PubMed ID: 21147446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Numerical and experimental investigations of the flow-pressure relation in multiple sequential stenoses coronary artery.
    Li S; Chin C; Thondapu V; Poon EKW; Monty JP; Li Y; Ooi ASH; Tu S; Barlis P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1083-1088. PubMed ID: 28220273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Invasive functional testing.
    Papadopoulou SL; Girasis C
    EuroIntervention; 2010 May; 6 Suppl G():G79-86. PubMed ID: 20542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Non-invasive coronary wave intensity analysis.
    Broyd CJ; Rigo F; Davies J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 28631107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve?
    De Maria GL; Garcia-Garcia HM; Scarsini R; Hideo-Kajita A; Gonzalo López N; Leone AM; Sarno G; Daemen J; Shlofmitz E; Jeremias A; Tebaldi M; Bezerra HG; Tu S; Lemos PA; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Collet C; Banning AP; Barbato E; Johnson NP; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 13(4):e008487. PubMed ID: 32295416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve.
    Rudzinski W; Waller AH; Rusovici A; Dehnee A; Nasur A; Benz M; Sanchez S; Klapholz M; Kaluski E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 22961876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio a New Standard of Care for Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Lesions? More Questions Than Answers.
    Kern MJ; Seto AH
    Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(24):2295-2297. PubMed ID: 29229617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Association of Hemodynamic Severity With Plaque Vulnerability and Complexity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve Study.
    Matsuo Y; Higashioka D; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Kitabata H; Terada K; Emori H; Katayama Y; Taruya A; Nishiguchi T; Shimamura K; Kameyama T; Kuroi A; Yamano T; Tanimoto T; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Kubo T; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):1103-1105. PubMed ID: 30660534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Funtional significance of the intermediate lesion in a single coronary artery assessed by fractional flow reserve.
    Ha SJ; Kwon SH; Kim SJ
    Korean J Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 29(6):822-4. PubMed ID: 25378982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Long-Term Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Implantation.
    Fournier S; Toth GG; Colaiori I; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 12(5):e007712. PubMed ID: 31084238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contemporary assessment of coronary hemodynamics in the catheter laboratory.
    Asrress KN; Allahwala U; Bhindi R
    Future Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 12(6):601-604. PubMed ID: 27791386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Three branch bifurcation QCA: moving forward but still short of the goal.
    Kern MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):824-5. PubMed ID: 21104731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The dawn of perfusion CMR: taking over from FFR in suspected coronary artery disease?
    Westwood MA; Ghosh AK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1106-7. PubMed ID: 25459591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. State of the art: pressure wire and coronary functional assessment.
    Echavarría-Pinto M; Collet C; Escaned J; Piek JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(6):666-679. PubMed ID: 28844029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Coronary microvascular disease and clinical prognosis in deferred lesions: The index of microcirculatory resistance.
    Chung JH; Lee KE; Park JW; Shin ES
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(2):137-140. PubMed ID: 30584125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Physiological severity of coronary artery stenosis.
    Gould KL
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2006 Dec; 291(6):H2583-5. PubMed ID: 16815984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Assessment of fractional coronary blood flow reserve].
    Mironov VM; Merkulov EV; Samko AN
    Kardiologiia; 2012; 52(8):66-71. PubMed ID: 23098402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses.
    Meuwissen M; Siebes M; Chamuleau SA; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2003 Sep; 1(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15030274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of coronary microcirculation in a swine animal model.
    Zhang Z; Takarada S; Molloi S
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2011 Aug; 301(2):H402-8. PubMed ID: 21622826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.