BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25657521)

  • 1. A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.
    Aman N; Khan FR; Salim A; Farid H
    J Conserv Dent; 2015; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 25657521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Follow-up of a Fissure Sealant Placed Using Different Adhesive Protocols: A 24-month Split-mouth Study.
    Yazici AR; Bayazit EO; Kutuk ZB; Ozgunaltay G; Ergin E; Berber A
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):362-371. PubMed ID: 29630489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 12-month clinical evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with and without etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in newly-erupted teeth.
    Nogourani MK; Janghorbani M; Khadem P; Jadidi Z; Jalali S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 22858703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An
    Nirwan M; Nigam AG; Marwah N; Nayak UA; Bansal A; Gahlot MS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of successful outcome of pit and fissure sealants bonded with etch-and-rinse adhesive and self-etch adhesive system.
    Baloch JM; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Younus MZ; Nasim MO; Rashid S
    Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(5):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 34180435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 48-month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed with different adhesive systems.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Tuncer D; Firat E; Unluer S; Baseren M
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 23210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results.
    Yazici AR; Karaman E; Baseren M; Tuncer D; Yazici E; Unlüer S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19953772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop.
    Feigal RJ; Quelhas I
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):249-51. PubMed ID: 14579879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
    Khare M; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with self-etching adhesive on permanent teeth].
    Peng SM; Zhao W; Lin JC; Ling JQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Dec; 15(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 17533704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems.
    Nahvi A; Razavian A; Abedi H; Charati JY
    Eur J Dent; 2018; 12(2):242-246. PubMed ID: 29988227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.
    Althomali YM; Musa S; Manan NM; Nor NAM
    Pediatr Dent; 2022 Jul; 44(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 35999682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adhesive systems under fissure sealants: yes or no?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bagherian A; Sarraf Shirazi A; Sadeghi R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Jun; 147(6):446-56. PubMed ID: 26993212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of  clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Gupta D; Rao A; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():261. PubMed ID: 35529283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing.
    Gomes-Silva JM; Torres CP; Contente MM; Oliveira MA; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19180325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the effect of one-step self etching adhesives applied in pit and fissure sealing].
    Su HR; Xu PC; Qian WH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 27609386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results.
    Sakkas C; Khomenko L; Trachuk I
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Apr; 14(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 23549995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Adhesive Application on Sealant Success: A Clinical Study of Fifth and Seventh Generation Adhesive Systems.
    Tandon V; Lingesha RT; Tangade PS; Tirth A; Pal SK; Lingesha CT; Arora V; Yadav V
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Oct; 12(10):712-9. PubMed ID: 27252754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.