These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25658448)

  • 1. Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117697. PubMed ID: 25658448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of the previous outcome on probabilistic choice in rats.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 23205915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):262-279. PubMed ID: 29120214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The subjective value of probabilistic outcomes: Impact of reward magnitude on choice with uncertain rewards in rats.
    Zoratto F; Laviola G; Adriani W
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 617():225-31. PubMed ID: 26905669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses.
    Mitchell SH; Wilson VB
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 19766702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future is risky: discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes.
    Blackburn M; El-Deredy W
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():9-18. PubMed ID: 23201372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.
    Marshall AT; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():134-48. PubMed ID: 26506254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optogenetic Dissection of Temporal Dynamics of Amygdala-Striatal Interplay during Risk/Reward Decision Making.
    Bercovici DA; Princz-Lebel O; Tse MT; Moorman DE; Floresco SB
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of acute and sub-chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats in a probabilistic delay-discounting task.
    Kelsey JE; Niraula A
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Jun; 227(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 23340981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on choice between small certain rewards and large uncertain rewards in rats.
    Cardinal RN; Howes NJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 May; 6():37. PubMed ID: 15921529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal behavior and risky choice in humans: Exploring the boundaries of the description-experience gap.
    Cox DJ; Dallery J
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():301-308. PubMed ID: 30232043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision making under risk: framing effects in pigeon risk preferences.
    Clayton WD; Brantley SM; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Oct; 25(5):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 35296920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dopaminergic modulation of reward-guided decision making in alcohol-preferring AA rats.
    Oinio V; Bäckström P; Uhari-Väänänen J; Raasmaja A; Piepponen P; Kiianmaa K
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 May; 326():87-95. PubMed ID: 28274654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists impair discriminability of reinforcer magnitude, but not risky choice, in a probability-discounting task.
    Yates JR; Chitwood MR; Evans KE; Kappesser JL; Murray CP; Paradella-Bradley TA; Torline BT
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 365():77-81. PubMed ID: 30831139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice patterns reveal qualitative individual differences among discounting of delayed gains, delayed losses, and probabilistic losses.
    Yeh YH; Myerson J; Strube MJ; Green L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):609-625. PubMed ID: 32266721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Subjective probability of reward receipt and the magnitude effect in probability discounting].
    Isomura M; Aoyama K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Jun; 79(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 18678068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental rearing effects on impulsivity and reward sensitivity.
    Kirkpatrick K; Marshall AT; Clarke J; Cain ME
    Behav Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 127(5):712-24. PubMed ID: 24128360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pupil dilation and response slowing distinguish deliberate explorative choices in the probabilistic learning task.
    Kozunova GL; Sayfulina KE; Prokofyev AO; Medvedev VA; Rytikova AM; Stroganova TA; Chernyshev BV
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 22(5):1108-1129. PubMed ID: 35359274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty in action-value estimation affects both action choice and learning rate of the choice behaviors of rats.
    Funamizu A; Ito M; Doya K; Kanzaki R; Takahashi H
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 35(7):1180-9. PubMed ID: 22487046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.