These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25658987)

  • 1. Youden's index and the weight of evidence.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Youden's Index and the Weight of Evidence Revisited.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(6):576-7. PubMed ID: 26548463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation.
    Hajian-Tilaki K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2374-2383. PubMed ID: 28673124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests - Part 2 [Pre-test and post-test probability and odds, Likelihood ratios, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Youden's Index and Diagnostic test biases].
    Gogtay NJ
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Jul; 65(7):86-91. PubMed ID: 28792173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Bayes' rule in diagnostic testing: a graphical explanation.
    Johnson KM
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2017 Sep; 4(3):159-167. PubMed ID: 29536931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Youden's Index and the Likelihood Ratio Positive in Diagnostic Testing.
    Böhning D
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(4):382-3. PubMed ID: 26063628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Fosgate GT
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
    Proeve M
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rule of 100: a litmus test for informationless diagnostic tests.
    Westover AM; Shapiro D; Westover MB; Bianchi MT
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jun; 94(1112):364-366. PubMed ID: 29514996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tjur's R
    Hughes G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):801-802. PubMed ID: 29108818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting Youden's index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Böhning D; Böhning W; Holling H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):543-54. PubMed ID: 18375457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A ruler for interpreting diagnostic test results.
    Hellmich M; Lehmacher W
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(1):124-6. PubMed ID: 15778803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal-threshold determination in shared decision making.
    Lin S; Ma Y; Zou H
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 26(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 31738475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting the p value.
    Maldonado F; West CP
    Chest; 2011 Mar; 139(3):723-724. PubMed ID: 21362664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. We only see what we already know--a modified Bayes' formula to explain inherent limitations of diagnostic tests.
    Sonnenberg A
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 15325029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regret graphs, diagnostic uncertainty and Youden's Index.
    Hilden J; Glasziou P
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):969-86. PubMed ID: 8783436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
    Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bayes theorem and likelihood ratios].
    Nendaz MR; Perrier A
    Rev Mal Respir; 2004 Apr; 21(2 Pt 1):394-7. PubMed ID: 15211251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVI. Likelihood ratios and Bayes' rule].
    Vermeulen M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2421-4. PubMed ID: 11776667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.