These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25658987)
21. Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios. Biggerstaff BJ Stat Med; 2000 Mar; 19(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 10700737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Diamond GA; Forrester JS; Hirsch M; Staniloff HM; Vas R; Berman DS; Swan HJ J Clin Invest; 1980 May; 65(5):1210-21. PubMed ID: 6767741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity. Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results. Habibzadeh F; Habibzadeh P; Yadollahie M Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016 Oct; 26(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 27812299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bayes' theorem: a paradigm research tool in biomedical sciences. Okeh UM; Ugwu AC East Afr J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 6 Suppl(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20088070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities. Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Posttest probability calculation by weights. A simple form of Bayes' theorem. Rembold CM; Watson D Ann Intern Med; 1988 Jan; 108(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 3276261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities? Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation between serial tests made disease probability estimates erroneous. van Walraven C; Austin PC; Jennings A; Forster AJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1301-5. PubMed ID: 19716680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations. Paul M; Riebler A; Bachmann LM; Rue H; Held L Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1325-39. PubMed ID: 20101670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication. Sharifabadi AD; Korevaar DA; McGrath TA; van Es N; Frank RA; Cherpak L; Dang W; Salameh JP; Nguyen F; Stanley C; McInnes MDF Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3632-3639. PubMed ID: 29564596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enter the reverend: introduction to and application of Bayes' theorem in clinical ophthalmology. Thomas R; Mengersen K; Parikh RS; Walland MJ; Muliyil J Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 39(9):865-70. PubMed ID: 21575118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The diagnostic information of tests for the detection of cancer: the usefulness of the likelihood ratio concept. Giard RW; Hermans J Eur J Cancer; 1996 Nov; 32A(12):2042-8. PubMed ID: 9014742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Bayesian statistic: an approach fitted to clinic]. Meyer N; Vinzio S; Goichot B Rev Med Interne; 2009 Mar; 30(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18757117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The likelihood ratio and its graphical representation. Habibzadeh F; Habibzadeh P Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Jun; 29(2):020101. PubMed ID: 31015780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs. Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evidence-based medicine in otolaryngology Part 4: everyday probabilities--nonbinary diagnostic tests. Shin JJ; Stinnett SS; Randolph GW Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug; 149(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 23715687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Statistical methods in epidemiology. VIII. On the use of likelihood ratios for diagnostic testing with an application to general practice. Rigby AS; Summerton N Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):475-80. PubMed ID: 16040551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]