These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25659342)

  • 1. Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases.
    Konialis C; Pangalos C
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):218-32. PubMed ID: 25659342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis.
    Konialis C; Hagnefelt B; Sevastidou S; Karapanou S; Pispili K; Markaki A; Pangalos C
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 21448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effectiveness of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies].
    Jóźwiak A; Bijok J; Massalska D; Pawłowska B; Ilnicka A; Bogdanowicz J; Masternak-Wasiuk K; Jakiel G; Roszkowski T
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):682-90. PubMed ID: 24191501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for rapid detection of aneuploidies in prenatal diagnosis].
    Ma DY; Hu P; Zhang JJ; Yi L; Ji XQ; Yang C; Cheng J; Li L; Lin Y; Xu ZF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 28(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 21983731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as standard approach for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical experience of 1763 prenatal cases.
    Papoulidis I; Sotiriadis A; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Oikonomidou E; Orru S; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(13):1269-77. PubMed ID: 26289927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Jia Y; Zhao H; Shi D; Peng W; Xie L; Wang W; Jiang F; Zhang H; Wang X
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):7003-11. PubMed ID: 25400788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive prenatal screening or advanced diagnostic testing: caveat emptor.
    Evans MI; Wapner RJ; Berkowitz RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 27131582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.
    Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): a reliable alternative for fetal chromosome analysis?
    Chitty LS; Kistler J; Akolekar R; Liddle S; Nicolaides K; Levett L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22098527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of Detection Rates of Aneuploidy in High-Risk Pregnancy Using an Approach Based on Nuchal Translucency and Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: A Cohort Study.
    Khalil A; Mahmoodian N; Kulkarni A; Homfray T; Papageorghiou A; Bhide A; Thilaganathan B
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 25925597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
    Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
    Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for rapid detection of aneuploidies and structural chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis].
    Zhang J; Hu P; Luo C; Ji Q; Zhou J; Liu A; Ma D; Xu Z
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 31(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 24510553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
    Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.
    Van den Veyver IB; Patel A; Shaw CA; Pursley AN; Kang SH; Simovich MJ; Ward PA; Darilek S; Johnson A; Neill SE; Bi W; White LD; Eng CM; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19012303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Usefulness of MLPA technique for rapid prenatal detection of aneuploidy. Results of 409 diagnostic studies].
    Bocian E; Kasprzycka J; Jakubów-Durska K; Łuszczek A; Bernaciak J
    Ginekol Pol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 22379928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.
    Levy B; Wapner R
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29447663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.