103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25659847)
1. Photoelastic Stress Distribution Produced by Different Retention Systems for a Single-Implant Mandibular Overdenture.
Nascimento JFM; Aguiar-Júnior FA; Nogueira TE; Rodrigues RCS; Leles CR
J Prosthodont; 2015 Oct; 24(7):538-542. PubMed ID: 25659847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of mucosa thicknesses on stress distribution of implant-supported overdentures under unilateral loading: Photoelastic analysis.
Ozyilmaz OY; Aykent F; Sayin Ozel G
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2019; 17(4):2280800019882645. PubMed ID: 31779504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Martin-Fernandez E; Brizuela-Velasco A; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 9(5):371-380. PubMed ID: 29142645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 1-year clinical and radiographical study.
Elsyad MA; Shoukouki AH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20443800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative evaluation of fatigue resistance of two different implant overdenture stud attachments with two different denture base materials: An
Agrawal N; Jain S; Agrawal D
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29430136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
