214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25660012)
1. Long head biceps tenodesis with a knotless cinch suture anchor: a biomechanical analysis.
Kaback LA; Gowda AL; Paller D; Green A; Blaine T
Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):831-5. PubMed ID: 25660012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of two arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis: triple loop suture versus simple suture.
Gigi R; Dolkart O; Sharfman ZT; Goldstein Y; Brosh T; Rath E; Maman E; Chechik O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jan; 26(1):165-169. PubMed ID: 27499518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Analysis of Lark-Loop, Lasso-Loop and Krackow Suture Technique in Tenodesis.
Zhou M; Zhou C; Cui D; Long Y; Yan Y; Zheng Z; Meng K; Zhang J; Hou J; Yang R
Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(4):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 36852476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques.
Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a Two Simple Stitches Method Provide Secure Fixation Strength in Biceps Tenodesis?: Biomechanical Evaluation of Various Suture Techniques.
Kim TM; Shin MH; Baek S; Lee DR; Chung SW
Clin Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 36061853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical study comparing biceps wedge tenodesis with other proximal long head of the biceps tenodesis techniques.
Su WR; Budoff JE; Chiang CH; Lee CJ; Lin CL
Arthroscopy; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1498-505. PubMed ID: 23992987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of two techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: interference screw versus implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation.
Sampatacos N; Getelman MH; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Nov; 23(11):1731-9. PubMed ID: 24810080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel implant-free loop Tenodesis vs. simple Tenotomy of the long biceps tendon - a biomechanical investigation.
Kerschbaum M; Voss A; Pfeifer C; Weiss I; Mayr A; Alt V; Greiner S; Grechenig S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Nov; 20(1):522. PubMed ID: 31706308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor.
Kongmalai P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 30145670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.
Werner BC; Lyons ML; Evans CL; Griffin JW; Hart JM; Miller MD; Brockmeier SF
Arthroscopy; 2015 Apr; 31(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 25498870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of the three techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation with Cobra Guide, interference screw and suture anchor.
Poberaj B; Marjanovič B; Zupančič M; Nabergoj M; Cvetko E; Balažic M; Senekovič V
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30762217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
