467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25660208)
1. Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
Jain S; Loblaw A; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Kattan MW; Mamedov A; Jethava V; Sethukavalan P; Yu C; Klotz L
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25660208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nomogram for predicting upgrading in patients with low- and intermediate-grade prostate cancer in the era of extended prostate sampling.
Moussa AS; Kattan MW; Berglund R; Yu C; Fareed K; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2010 Feb; 105(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 19681898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active Surveillance is an Appropriate Management Strategy for a Proportion of Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen Testing.
Overholser S; Nielsen M; Torkko K; Cwilka D; Weaver B; Shi X; Leach RJ; Hernandez J; Huang T; Thompson IM; Thompson IM
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 25636657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of a surgically derived nomogram to predict Gleason score upgrading applied to a cohort of patients with "favorable-risk" prostate cancer treated with permanent seed brachytherapy.
Bowes D; Crook JM; Wallace K; Evans A; Toi A; Finelli A; Jewett MA; Fleshner N; Catton C
Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 22698474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation.
Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Montorsi F; Erbersdobler A; Steuber T; Salonia A; Currlin E; Scattoni V; Friedrich MG; Schlomm T; Haese A; Michl U; Colombo R; Heinzer H; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Roehrborn CG; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2006 Aug; 98(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 16879673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance.
Berglund RK; Masterson TA; Vora KC; Eggener SE; Eastham JA; Guillonneau BD
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1964-7; discussion 1967-8. PubMed ID: 18801515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Voss J; Pal R; Ahmed S; Hannah M; Jaulim A; Walton T
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 29239082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Nassiri N; Margolis DJ; Natarajan S; Sharma DS; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):632-639. PubMed ID: 27639713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Chun FK; Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Currlin E; Walz J; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; McCormack M; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):820-6. PubMed ID: 16439050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic upgrading in patients eligible for active surveillance on saturation biopsy.
Chung PH; Darwish OM; Roehrborn CG; Kapur P; Lotan Y
Can J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):7656-60. PubMed ID: 25694015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance.
Audenet F; Rozet F; Resche-Rigon M; Bernard R; Ingels A; Prapotnich D; Sanchez-Salas R; Galiano M; Barret E; Cathelineau X
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e907-e913. PubMed ID: 28522288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
