467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25660208)
21. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population.
Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Thomas JV; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(11):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 28140460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. External validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology among Japanese patients.
Imamoto T; Suzuki H; Utsumi T; Takano M; Suyama T; Kawamura K; Kamiya N; Naya Y; Ueda T; Ichikawa T
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):404-10. PubMed ID: 19716590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comorbid Disease Burden is Independently Associated with Higher Risk Disease at Prostatectomy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Maurice MJ; Zhu H; Kiechle JE; Kim SP; Abouassaly R
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 1):919-24. PubMed ID: 26519653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 21895937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of PSA velocity in predicting pathologic upgrade for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Krane LS; Menon M; Kaul SA; Siddiqui SA; Wambi C; Peabody JO; Agarwal PK
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 19576796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Eggener SE; Mueller A; Berglund RK; Ayyathurai R; Soloway C; Soloway MS; Abouassaly R; Klein EA; Jones SJ; Zappavigna C; Goldenberg L; Scardino PT; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1 Suppl):S19-25; discussion S25. PubMed ID: 23234624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.
Margel D; Nandy I; Wilson TH; Castro R; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2039-45. PubMed ID: 23820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Terry S; Allory Y; Ouzaïd I; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 22300755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy in Chinese population: Updated nomograms.
Xu H; Bai PD; Hu MB; Mao SH; Zhu WH; Hu JM; Liu SH; Yang T; Hou JY; Hu Y; Ding Q; Jiang HW
Actas Urol Esp; 2017 Apr; 41(3):162-171. PubMed ID: 27522521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving risk stratification in patients with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a nomogram predicting the risk of biopsy progression.
Iremashvili V; Burdick-Will J; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 23551868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Negative first follow-up prostate biopsy on active surveillance is associated with decreased risk of upgrading, suspicion of progression and converting to active treatment.
Singh S; Sandhu P; Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Dewan K; Clovis S; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Challacombe B; Brown C; Cathcart P; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transperineal Template-guided Mapping Biopsy Identifies Pathologic Differences Between Very-Low-risk and Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Merrick GS; Delatore A; Butler WM; Bennett A; Fiano R; Anderson R; Adamovich E
Am J Clin Oncol; 2017 Feb; 40(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 25068472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
