These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25660339)
1. What information do consumers consider, and how do they look for it, when shopping for groceries online? Benn Y; Webb TL; Chang BP; Reidy J Appetite; 2015 Jun; 89():265-73. PubMed ID: 25660339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online grocery shopping: promise and pitfalls for healthier food and beverage purchases. Jilcott Pitts SB; Ng SW; Blitstein JL; Gustafson A; Niculescu M Public Health Nutr; 2018 Dec; 21(18):3360-3376. PubMed ID: 30338751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice. Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the nutri-score on food choice: A choice experiment in a Dutch supermarket. van den Akker K; Bartelet D; Brouwer L; Luijpers S; Nap T; Havermans R Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105664. PubMed ID: 34453996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of front-of-package nutrition labeling on food purchases: a systematic review. An R; Shi Y; Shen J; Bullard T; Liu G; Yang Q; Chen N; Cao L Public Health; 2021 Feb; 191():59-67. PubMed ID: 33517247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments. Roseman MG; Joung HW; Littlejohn EI J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 May; 118(5):904-912. PubMed ID: 29198844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers' motives in food choice. Vyth EL; Steenhuis IH; Vlot JA; Wulp A; Hogenes MG; Looije DH; Brug J; Seidell JC Public Health Nutr; 2010 Nov; 13(11):1882-9. PubMed ID: 20359378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats. Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using a 3D virtual supermarket to measure food purchase behavior: a validation study. Waterlander WE; Jiang Y; Steenhuis IH; Ni Mhurchu C J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e107. PubMed ID: 25921185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Digital Food Labels on Healthy Food Choices in Online Grocery Shopping. Fuchs KL; Lian J; Michels L; Mayer S; Toniato E; Tiefenbeck V Nutrients; 2022 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 35631185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial. Ni Mhurchu C; Eyles H; Jiang Y; Blakely T Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():360-365. PubMed ID: 29191745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment. Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The virtual supermarket: an innovative research tool to study consumer food purchasing behaviour. Waterlander WE; Scarpa M; Lentz D; Steenhuis IH BMC Public Health; 2011 Jul; 11():589. PubMed ID: 21787391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of alternative label formats on choice of high- and low-sodium products in a New Zealand population sample. McLean R; Hoek J; Hedderley D Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 22281127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice. Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Change of behaviour when selecting food products in a supermarket environment after reminding consumers about weight management. Saarela AM Public Health Nutr; 2014 May; 17(5):1147-55. PubMed ID: 23442333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficacy of 'high in' warning labels, health star and traffic light front-of-package labelling: an online randomised control trial. Vanderlee L; Franco-Arellano B; Ahmed M; Oh A; Lou W; L'Abbé MR Public Health Nutr; 2021 Jan; 24(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 33019950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can nutritional information modify purchase of ultra-processed products? Results from a simulated online shopping experiment. Machín L; Arrúa A; Giménez A; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Ares G Public Health Nutr; 2018 Jan; 21(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28716163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]