205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25660739)
1. Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Pösö J; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2775-84. PubMed ID: 25660739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single step genomic evaluation for female fertility in Nordic Red dairy cattle.
Matilainen K; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Oct; 135(5):337-348. PubMed ID: 30112802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving genetic evaluation using a multitrait single-step genomic model for ability to resume cycling after calving, measured by activity tags in Holstein cows.
Ismael A; Løvendahl P; Fogh A; Lund MS; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Oct; 100(10):8188-8196. PubMed ID: 28780110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.
Brzáková M; Bauer J; Steyn Y; Šplíchal J; Fulínová D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36334266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
