These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2566119)

  • 1. Where next with peer-review?
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1989 May; 339(6219):11. PubMed ID: 2566119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer Review of Abstracts Submitted to An Internal Medicine National Meeting: Is It a Predictor of Future Publication?
    Scholcoff C; Sanghani P; Jackson W; Egloff HM; Sawatsky AP; Jackson JL
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1002-1003. PubMed ID: 29663277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of peer reviewers for advancing the field.
    Putnam M
    J Gerontol Soc Work; 2015; 58(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25529970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review.
    Cotton P
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2775-8. PubMed ID: 8133598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ancient texts to PubMed: a brief history of the peer-review process.
    Farrell PR; Magida Farrell L; Farrell MK
    J Perinatol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):13-15. PubMed ID: 27853323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More peering into editorial peer review.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2856-8. PubMed ID: 8133628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training for peer review.
    Gough NR
    Sci Signal; 2009 Aug; 2(85):tr2. PubMed ID: 19706874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?
    Ferreira C; Bastille-Rousseau G; Bennett AM; Ellington EH; Terwissen C; Austin C; Borlestean A; Boudreau MR; Chan K; Forsythe A; Hossie TJ; Landolt K; Longhi J; Otis JA; Peers MJ; Rae J; Seguin J; Watt C; Wehtje M; Murray DL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Aug; 91(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 25865035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The origin and significance of our supplements--a response to the New England Journal of Medicine.
    Opie LH
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 1993 Aug; 7 Suppl 3():491-2. PubMed ID: 8251417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
    Balistreri WF
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predatory publishers: what the nursing community needs to know.
    International Academy of Nursing Editors "Predatory Publishing Practices" Collaborative
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2015 Apr; 30(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 25813293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict of interest.
    Müller A
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):199. PubMed ID: 8461066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fostering integrity in scientific research and publishing.
    Burton GA; Wenning RJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):560-561. PubMed ID: 28613026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review.
    Blaivas JG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):617. PubMed ID: 15382180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Formal expert estimation of the quality of the research publications in psychiatry].
    Zorin NA; Nemtsov AV
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2001; 101(3):64-8. PubMed ID: 11490453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education.
    Eva KW
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 19140991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in scientific publishing: Dark clouds loom large.
    Vinny PW; Vishnu VY; Lal V
    J Neurol Sci; 2016 Apr; 363():119-20. PubMed ID: 27000235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journal peer reviewing. Anonymity or disclosure?
    DeBakey L
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 Mar; 108(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 2310331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.