211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25661713)
1. No evidence for MHC class I-based disassortative mating in a wild population of great tits.
Sepil I; Radersma R; Santure AW; De Cauwer I; Slate J; Sheldon BC
J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):642-54. PubMed ID: 25661713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mhc-linked survival and lifetime reproductive success in a wild population of great tits.
Sepil I; Lachish S; Sheldon BC
Mol Ecol; 2013 Jan; 22(2):384-96. PubMed ID: 23190387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MHC-disassortative mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in a solitary primate.
Huchard E; Baniel A; Schliehe-Diecks S; Kappeler PM
Mol Ecol; 2013 Aug; 22(15):4071-86. PubMed ID: 23889546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MHC class II-assortative mate choice in European badgers (Meles meles).
Sin YW; Annavi G; Newman C; Buesching C; Burke T; Macdonald DW; Dugdale HL
Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(12):3138-50. PubMed ID: 25913367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MHC, mate choice and heterozygote advantage in a wild social primate.
Huchard E; Knapp LA; Wang J; Raymond M; Cowlishaw G
Mol Ecol; 2010 Jun; 19(12):2545-61. PubMed ID: 20492522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: driven by kin-selection?
Wang C; Lu X
Mol Ecol; 2011 Jul; 20(13):2851-63. PubMed ID: 21438933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity.
Forsberg LA; Dannewitz J; Petersson E; Grahn M
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 17714303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extra-pair mating in a passerine bird with highly duplicated major histocompatibility complex class II: Preference for the golden mean.
Rekdal SL; Anmarkrud JA; Lifjeld JT; Johnsen A
Mol Ecol; 2019 Dec; 28(23):5133-5144. PubMed ID: 31614034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing for post-copulatory selection for major histocompatibility complex genotype in a semi-free-ranging primate population.
Setchell JM; Abbott KM; Gonzalez JP; Knapp LA
Am J Primatol; 2013 Oct; 75(10):1021-31. PubMed ID: 23677678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.
Galaverni M; Caniglia R; Milanesi P; Lapalombella S; Fabbri E; Randi E
J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 26610365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Male mate choice relies on major histocompatibility complex class I in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
Roth O; Sundin J; Berglund A; Rosenqvist G; Wegner KM
J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):929-38. PubMed ID: 24725009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MHC genotype predicts mate choice in the ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus.
Baratti M; Dessì-Fulgheri F; Ambrosini R; Bonisoli-Alquati A; Caprioli M; Goti E; Matteo A; Monnanni R; Ragionieri L; Ristori E; Romano M; Rubolini D; Scialpi A; Saino N
J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1531-42. PubMed ID: 22591334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The hidden benefits of sex: evidence for MHC-associated mate choice in primate societies.
Setchell JM; Huchard E
Bioessays; 2010 Nov; 32(11):940-8. PubMed ID: 20827785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
Agbali M; Reichard M; Bryjová A; Bryja J; Smith C
Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1683-96. PubMed ID: 20148959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations.
Roberts SC
Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3121-3. PubMed ID: 19682244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Major histocompatibility complex similarity and sexual selection: different does not always mean attractive.
Gasparini C; Congiu L; Pilastro A
Mol Ecol; 2015 Aug; 24(16):4286-95. PubMed ID: 25940673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis.
Winternitz J; Abbate JL; Huchard E; Havlíček J; Garamszegi LZ
Mol Ecol; 2017 Jan; 26(2):668-688. PubMed ID: 27859823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female rose bitterling prefer MHC-dissimilar males: experimental evidence.
Reichard M; Spence R; Bryjová A; Bryja J; Smith C
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40780. PubMed ID: 22815816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
