204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25661901)
1. Beliefs about research and social work practice: a systematic psychometric review of scales.
Gregory VL
J Evid Inf Soc Work; 2015; 12(2):237-59. PubMed ID: 25661901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptation and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Belief and Implementation scales for French-speaking Swiss nurses and allied healthcare providers.
Verloo H; Desmedt M; Morin D
J Clin Nurs; 2017 Sep; 26(17-18):2735-2743. PubMed ID: 28252837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric Properties of the Slovak and Czech Versions of the Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation Scales.
Zeleníková R; Gurková E; Žiaková K; Tomagová M; Jarošová D; Fineout-Overholt E
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 26840010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gregory research beliefs scale: discriminant construct, concurrent criterion, and known-groups validity.
Gregory VL
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2012; 9(5):465-80. PubMed ID: 23092376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of Hope Scales: A systematic review.
Redlich-Amirav D; Ansell LJ; Harrison M; Norrena KL; Armijo-Olivo S
Int J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul; 72(7):e13213. PubMed ID: 29920883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural translations and adaptations of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS).
Dambi JM; Corten L; Chiwaridzo M; Jack H; Mlambo T; Jelsma J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 May; 16(1):80. PubMed ID: 29716589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort.
Niedhammer I
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 75(3):129-44. PubMed ID: 11954980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric analysis of two new scales: the evidence-based practice nursing leadership and work environment scales.
Pryse Y; McDaniel A; Schafer J
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2014 Aug; 11(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 24986757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties.
Mansutti I; Saiani L; Grassetti L; Palese A
Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Mar; 68():60-72. PubMed ID: 28088008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the Psychometric Quality of Social Skills Measures: A Systematic Review.
Cordier R; Speyer R; Chen YW; Wilkes-Gillan S; Brown T; Bourke-Taylor H; Doma K; Leicht A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132299. PubMed ID: 26151362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric properties of presenteeism scales for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.
Roy JS; Desmeules F; MacDermid JC
J Rehabil Med; 2011 Jan; 43(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 21103849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Psychometric Properties of the Session Rating Scale: A Narrative Review.
Murphy MG; Rakes S; Harris RM
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019); 2020; 17(3):279-299. PubMed ID: 32420833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of implementation measures for public health and community settings and mapping of constructs against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a systematic review.
Clinton-McHarg T; Yoong SL; Tzelepis F; Regan T; Fielding A; Skelton E; Kingsland M; Ooi JY; Wolfenden L
Implement Sci; 2016 Nov; 11(1):148. PubMed ID: 27821146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - Psychometric properties of selected scales in the Polish version].
Widerszal-Bazyl M
Med Pr; 2017 May; 68(3):329-348. PubMed ID: 28512362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of psychometric testing of instruments that measure intention to work with older people.
Che CC; Hairi NN; Chong MC
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2049-2064. PubMed ID: 28122163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The psychometric properties of Orthorexia Nervosa assessment scales: A systematic review and reliability generalization.
Opitz MC; Newman E; Alvarado Vázquez Mellado AS; Robertson MDA; Sharpe H
Appetite; 2020 Dec; 155():104797. PubMed ID: 32652100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of nursing practice environment scale.
Chiang HY; Lin SY
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Mar; 18(6):919-29. PubMed ID: 19017371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Poverty and Housing Scale: report on a pilot study.
Galambos CM; MacMaster SA
J Health Soc Policy; 2004; 19(3):51-65. PubMed ID: 15829453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion.
Cordier R; Milbourn B; Martin R; Buchanan A; Chung D; Speyer R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179109. PubMed ID: 28598984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
