These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25663152)

  • 1. How Well Do the Generic Multi-attribute Utility Instruments Incorporate Patient and Public Views Into Their Descriptive Systems?
    Stevens KJ
    Patient; 2016 Feb; 9(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 25663152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can multi-attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being?
    Richardson J; Chen G; Khan MA; Iezzi A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 25623064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.
    Chen G; Ratcliffe J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25985933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring the Sensitivity and Construct Validity of 6 Utility Instruments in 7 Disease Areas.
    Richardson J; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Chen G; Maxwell A
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 26582319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: a review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002-4.
    Scuffham PA; Whitty JA; Mitchell A; Viney R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 18370565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures.
    Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Richardson J
    Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 205(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 25257063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using qualitative methods to inform the trade-off between content validity and consistency in utility assessment: the example of type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.
    McGrath C; Rofail D; Gargon E; Abetz L
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Feb; 8():23. PubMed ID: 20152041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Development of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures of Health.
    Goodwin E; Green C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Apr; 14(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 26818198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculation of quality adjusted life years in the published literature: a review of methodology and transparency.
    Richardson G; Manca A
    Health Econ; 2004 Dec; 13(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 15386669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery.
    Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A
    Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome measurement in economic evaluation.
    Johannesson M; Jönsson B; Karlsson G
    Health Econ; 1996; 5(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 8880165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis in severe mental illness: outcome measures selection.
    Stant AD; Buskens E; Jenner JA; Wiersma D; TenVergert EM
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 17603150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: who should value health?
    Stamuli E
    Br Med Bull; 2011; 97():197-210. PubMed ID: 21285110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health economic studies: an introduction to cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analyses.
    Angevine PD; Berven S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S9-15. PubMed ID: 25299265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating feelings related to the uncertainty about future health in utility measurement.
    Gandjour A
    Health Econ; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 18074407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic Planning in Population Health and Public Health Practice: A Call to Action for Higher Education.
    Phelps C; Madhavan G; Rappuoli R; Levin S; Shortliffe E; Colwell R
    Milbank Q; 2016 Mar; 94(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 26994711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D utility scores on the acceptability of cost-utility ratios: results across five trial-based cost-utility studies.
    Joore M; Brunenberg D; Nelemans P; Wouters E; Kuijpers P; Honig A; Willems D; de Leeuw P; Severens J; Boonen A
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 19878492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
    Netten A; Burge P; Malley J; Potoglou D; Towers AM; Brazier J; Flynn T; Forder J; Wall B
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.