These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25663804)

  • 1. A new inverse regression model applied to radiation biodosimetry.
    Higueras M; Puig P; Ainsbury EA; Rothkamm K
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Feb; 471(2174):20140588. PubMed ID: 25663804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of six statistical distributions for analysis of chromosome aberration data for radiation biodosimetry.
    Ainsbury EA; Vinnikov VA; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):253-67. PubMed ID: 23325781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CytoBayesJ: software tools for Bayesian analysis of cytogenetic radiation dosimetry data.
    Ainsbury EA; Vinnikov V; Puig P; Maznyk N; Rothkamm K; Lloyd DC
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):184-91. PubMed ID: 23792213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zero-inflated regression models for radiation-induced chromosome aberration data: A comparative study.
    Oliveira M; Einbeck J; Higueras M; Ainsbury E; Puig P; Rothkamm K
    Biom J; 2016 Mar; 58(2):259-79. PubMed ID: 26461836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian analysis of overdispersed chromosome aberration data with the negative binomial model.
    Brame RS; Groer PG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 102(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 12408487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.
    Sasaki MS
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Feb; 79(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 12569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
    Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. radir package: an R implementation for cytogenetic biodosimetry dose estimation.
    Moriña D; Higueras M; Puig P; Ainsbury EA; Rothkamm K
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):557-69. PubMed ID: 26160852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note on Poisson goodness-of-fit tests for ionizing radiation induced chromosomal aberration samples.
    Higueras M; González JE; Di Giorgio M; Barquinero JF
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Jul; 94(7):656-663. PubMed ID: 29775402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bivariate zero-inflated regression for count data: a Bayesian approach with application to plant counts.
    Majumdar A; Gries C
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 27. PubMed ID: 21969981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing cytogenetic biodosimetry laboratory in Saudi Arabia and producing preliminary calibration curve of dicentric chromosomes as biomarker for medical dose estimation in response to radiation emergencies.
    Al-Hadyan K; Elewisy S; Moftah B; Shoukri M; Alzahrany A; Alsbeih G
    3 Biotech; 2014 Dec; 4(6):635-645. PubMed ID: 28324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry.
    Vinnikov VA; Ainsbury EA; Maznyk NA; Lloyd DC; Rothkamm K
    Radiat Res; 2010 Oct; 174(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 20726714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lognormal and Gamma Mixed Negative Binomial Regression.
    Zhou M; Li L; Dunson D; Carin L
    Proc Int Conf Mach Learn; 2012; 2012():1343-1350. PubMed ID: 25279391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chromosome aberration analysis in radiotherapy patients and simulated partial body exposures: biological dosimetry for non-uniform exposures.
    Sreedevi B; Rao BS; Nagaraj H; Pal NK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 11499434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suitability of scoring PCC rings and fragments for dose assessment after high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation.
    Puig R; Barrios L; Pujol M; Caballín MR; Barquinero JF
    Mutat Res; 2013 Sep; 757(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23872317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological optimization of heterogeneous dose distributions in systemic radiotherapy.
    Strigari L; D'Andrea M; Maini CL; Sciuto R; Benassi M
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1857-66. PubMed ID: 16872093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CYTOGENETIC DAMAGES IN LUNG CANCER PATIENTS TREATED BY EXTERNAL RADIATION THERAPY.
    Maznyk N; Sypko T; Starenkiy V; Bohatyrenko N; Bilozor N
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2019 Dec; 24():411-425. PubMed ID: 31841483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) and Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus (CBMN) Assay in the Field of Biological Dosimetry.
    Testa A; Palma V; Patrono C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():105-119. PubMed ID: 31473956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dose-response curve for biodosimetry from a 6 MV electron linear accelerator.
    Lemos-Pinto MM; Cadena M; Santos N; Fernandes TS; Borges E; Amaral A
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Oct; 48(10):908-14. PubMed ID: 26445334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early-response biological dosimetry--recommended countermeasure enhancements for mass-casualty radiological incidents and terrorism.
    Blakely WF; Salter CA; Prasanna PG
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 16217193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.