These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25663804)

  • 21. Enhancing Cytogenetic Biological Dosimetry Capabilities of the Philippines for Nuclear Incident Preparedness.
    Asaad CO; Caraos GL; Robles GJ; Asa AD; Cobar ML; Asaad AA
    Genome Integr; 2016; 7():4. PubMed ID: 28217280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses.
    Pujol M; Barquinero JF; Puig P; Puig R; Caballín MR; Barrios L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114137. PubMed ID: 25461738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation biodosimetry: applications for spaceflight.
    Blakely WF; Miller AC; Grace MB; McLeland CB; Luo L; Muderhwa JM; Miner VL; Prasanna PG
    Adv Space Res; 2003; 31(6):1487-93. PubMed ID: 12971403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Approaches for dealing with various sources of overdispersion in modeling count data: Scale adjustment versus modeling.
    Payne EH; Hardin JW; Egede LE; Ramakrishnan V; Selassie A; Gebregziabher M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1802-1823. PubMed ID: 26031359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Negative Binomial Process Count and Mixture Modeling.
    Zhou M; Carin L
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2015 Feb; 37(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 26353243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Issues in cytogenetic biological dosimetry: emphasis on radiation environments in space.
    Straume T; Bender MA
    Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S60-70. PubMed ID: 9355858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biological dosimetry using human interphase peripheral blood lymphocytes.
    Prasanna PG; Hamel CJ; Escalada ND; Duffy KL; Blakely WF
    Mil Med; 2002 Feb; 167(2 Suppl):10-2. PubMed ID: 11873484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lymphocyte chromosomal aberration assay in radiation biodosimetry.
    Agrawala PK; Adhikari JS; Chaudhury NK
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 21829315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Cytogenetic dosimetry: dose-effect curves and a methodological comparison].
    Catena C; Conti D; Del Nero A; Righi E
    Med Lav; 1993; 84(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 8316144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of Dose-Response Calibration Curve for Dicentric Chromosome Induced by X-Rays.
    Lusiyanti Y; Syaifudin M; Budiantari T; Purnami S; Ramadhani D
    Genome Integr; 2019; 10():2. PubMed ID: 31391915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biological dosimetry of chernobyl cleanup workers: inclusion of data on age and smoking provides improved radiation dose estimates.
    Moore II DH; Tucker JD
    Radiat Res; 1999 Dec; 152(6):655-64. PubMed ID: 10581536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing Gender-Specific Gene Expression Biodosimetry Using a Panel of Radiation-Responsive Genes for Determining Radiation Dose in Human Peripheral Blood.
    Li S; Lu X; Feng JB; Tian M; Wang J; Chen H; Chen DQ; Liu QJ
    Radiat Res; 2019 Aug; 192(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 31373872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Generalized Poisson distribution: the property of mixture of Poisson and comparison with negative binomial distribution.
    Joe H; Zhu R
    Biom J; 2005 Apr; 47(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 16389919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical modelling for falls count data.
    Ullah S; Finch CF; Day L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):384-92. PubMed ID: 20159058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical issues in biological radiation dosimetry for risk assessment using stable chromosome aberrations.
    Cologne JB; Pawel DJ; Preston DL
    Health Phys; 1998 Nov; 75(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 9790562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A methodology to design heuristics for model selection based on the characteristics of data: Application to investigate when the Negative Binomial Lindley (NB-L) is preferred over the Negative Binomial (NB).
    Shirazi M; Dhavala SS; Lord D; Geedipally SR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():186-194. PubMed ID: 28886410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry.
    Ainsbury EA; Lloyd DC
    Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 20065696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological Dosimetry Network in Africa: Establishment of a Dose-Response Curve Using Telomere and Centromere Staining.
    Soumboundou M; Nkengurutse I; Dossou J; Colicchio B; Djebou C; Gadji M; Houenon G; Dem A; Dedjan A; Diarra M; Adjibade R; Finot F; Hempel W; Dieterlen A; Jeandidier E; Rodriguez-Lafrasse C; M'kacher R
    Health Phys; 2019 Dec; 117(6):618-624. PubMed ID: 31211757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay by manual and automated scoring: calibration curves and dose prediction.
    De Sanctis S; De Amicis A; Di Cristofaro S; Franchini V; Regalbuto E; Mammana G; Lista F
    Health Phys; 2014 Jun; 106(6):745-9. PubMed ID: 24776908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter-individual variability in the response of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to ionizing radiation: comparison of the dicentric and micronucleus assays.
    Pajic J; Rakic B; Rovcanin B; Jovicic D; Novakovic I; Milovanovic A; Pajic V
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2015 Aug; 54(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 25903986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.