BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25665285)

  • 1. Moving forward on the Medicaid debate: lessons from the Oregon Experiment.
    Allen H
    Health Soc Work; 2015 Feb; 40(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 25665285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health care rationing: the Oregon experiment.
    Wood C
    Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(4):239-43, 262. PubMed ID: 1922424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oregon's plan for health care rationing.
    Wiener JM
    Brookings Rev; 1992; 10(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10118757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Oregon plan on Capitol Hill.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1991 Sep; 338(8770):808-9. PubMed ID: 1681173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards health rationing in the US?
    N Z Med J; 1991 Apr; 104(910):171. PubMed ID: 2020472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mothers and children last: the Oregon Medicaid experiment.
    Rosenbaum S
    Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(1-2):97-126. PubMed ID: 1621705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To ration or not to ration?
    Shapiro JP
    US News World Rep; 1992 Aug; 113(6):24, 26. PubMed ID: 10171091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Oregon Medicaid priority-setting project: the impact on poor children.
    Behrman RE; Larson CS
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(2):235-49; discussion 251-8. PubMed ID: 10120174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Utah the new Oregon?
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2005 Aug; 82(16):41, 45. PubMed ID: 16250359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudoscience and the law: the case of the Oregon Medicaid rationing experiment.
    Astrue MJ
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 9(4):375-86. PubMed ID: 8175321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oregon update.
    Sipes-Metzler PR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(5):13. PubMed ID: 1743944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 1992 Oregon Plan.
    Overfield C
    NAHAM Manage J; 1993; 18(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 10123910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tragic choices: state discretion over organ transplant funding for Medicaid recipients.
    Weigert DL
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 89():268-317. PubMed ID: 16086527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confronting costs: Medicaid spending is at the top of many legislative agendas.
    Hansen M
    State Legis; 2012 Jun; 38(6):30-2. PubMed ID: 22730577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sullivan made the right choice in rejecting the Oregon plan.
    Mason T
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10171280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Oregon Health Plan--lessons for the nation. Second of two parts.
    Bodenheimer T
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Sep; 337(10):720-3. PubMed ID: 9278472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Oregon experiment.
    Pawlson LG
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1991 Jun; 39(6):620-1. PubMed ID: 2037754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision time for rationing.
    Wagner L
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Jan; 22(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 10115917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Americans with Disabilities Act says 'No' to the Oregon Medicaid demonstration project.
    Lorber LZ; Kirk JR
    Healthspan; 1992 Oct; 9(9):7-11. PubMed ID: 10171297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oregon: a bellwether for state policy?
    Bus Health; 1989 Dec; 7(12):39. PubMed ID: 10304436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.