These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25665431)

  • 1. [Comparison of the shaping capability of reciprocating instruments in simulated canals in vitro].
    Tongfei S; Xiaomei H; Benxiang H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 32(6):606-10. PubMed ID: 25665431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating instruments in simulated S-shaped canals].
    Shao T; Hou X; Hou B
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 25030999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
    Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
    Qiu N; Wang CY; Liu YF; Yu XQ; Xue M
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Apr; 25(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 27329883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping Ability of Reciproc R25 File and Mtwo System Used in Continuous and Reciprocating Motion.
    Campanella V; Gianni L; Libonati A; Gallusi G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 32381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Reciproc in Simulated Root Canals.
    Maia Filho EM; Dos Reis Santos RM; Lima DM; da Silva Pereira SM; Soares JA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Ferreira MC; Carvalho CN; Bandeca MC; Tonetto MR; Borges AH; de Castro Rizzi C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):902-906. PubMed ID: 27965498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
    Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the shaping ability of four Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
    Duan YY; Hu N; Jiang Z; Xiao XM; Su Q
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Jun; 21(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22885487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the canal transportation of ProTaper GOLD, WaveOne GOLD, and TruNatomy in simulated double-curved canals.
    Kim H; Jeon SJ; Seo MS
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):533. PubMed ID: 34656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path.
    Bürklein S; Poschmann T; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1231-4. PubMed ID: 25069939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
    Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Gergi R; Arbab-Chirani R; Osta N; Naaman A
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1223-7. PubMed ID: 25069937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Gergi R; Osta N; Bourbouze G; Zgheib C; Arbab-Chirani R; Naaman A
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 24717063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
    Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Glide path management of rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals].
    Han Y; Bai YH; Hou XM
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):148-153. PubMed ID: 29483738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals.
    Keskin C; Sarıyılmaz E; Demiral M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2018; 12(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 29732023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Yoo YS; Cho YB
    Restor Dent Endod; 2012 Nov; 37(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 23430033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.