These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25665575)

  • 21. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP.
    Evrard GX; Langer GG; Perrakis A; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):108-17. PubMed ID: 17164533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The good, the bad and the twisted: a survey of ligand geometry in protein crystal structures.
    Liebeschuetz J; Hennemann J; Olsson T; Groom CR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Feb; 26(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 22246295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of the protein-ligand interaction energy for model building and validation.
    Beshnova DA; Pereira J; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):195-202. PubMed ID: 28291754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multivariate Analyses of Quality Metrics for Crystal Structures in the PDB Archive.
    Shao C; Yang H; Westbrook JD; Young JY; Zardecki C; Burley SK
    Structure; 2017 Mar; 25(3):458-468. PubMed ID: 28216043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Structure determination, refinement, and validation.
    Minasov G; Anderson WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1140():239-49. PubMed ID: 24590722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method.
    Klei HE; Moriarty NW; Echols N; Terwilliger TC; Baldwin ET; Pokross M; Posy S; Adams PD
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Jan; 70(Pt 1):134-43. PubMed ID: 24419386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proper modelling of ligand binding requires an ensemble of bound and unbound states.
    Pearce NM; Krojer T; von Delft F
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):256-266. PubMed ID: 28291761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Continuous mutual improvement of macromolecular structure models in the PDB and of X-ray crystallographic software: the dual role of deposited experimental data.
    Terwilliger TC; Bricogne G
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2014 Oct; 70(Pt 10):2533-43. PubMed ID: 25286839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection and correction of underassigned rotational symmetry prior to structure deposition.
    Poon BK; Grosse-Kunstleve RW; Zwart PH; Sauter NK
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2010 May; 66(Pt 5):503-13. PubMed ID: 20445225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational resources for protein modelling and drug discovery applications.
    Dhaliwal B; Chen YW
    Infect Disord Drug Targets; 2009 Nov; 9(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 19594423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. X-ray crystallography in drug discovery.
    Carvalho AL; Trincão J; Romão MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 572():31-56. PubMed ID: 20694684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Keep it together: restraints in crystallographic refinement of macromolecule-ligand complexes.
    Steiner RA; Tucker JA
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Feb; 73(Pt 2):93-102. PubMed ID: 28177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein crystallography for aspiring crystallographers or how to avoid pitfalls and traps in macromolecular structure determination.
    Wlodawer A; Minor W; Dauter Z; Jaskolski M
    FEBS J; 2013 Nov; 280(22):5705-36. PubMed ID: 24034303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of models for ordered solvent in macromolecular structures by a classifier based upon resolution-independent projections of local feature data.
    Jones L; Tynes M; Smith P
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2019 Aug; 75(Pt 8):696-717. PubMed ID: 31373570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computational tools for the analysis and visualization of multiple protein-ligand complexes.
    O'Brien SE; Brown DG; Mills JE; Phillips C; Morris G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Dec; 24(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 16169759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In situ ligand restraints from quantum-mechanical methods.
    Liebschner D; Moriarty NW; Poon BK; Adams PD
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2023 Feb; 79(Pt 2):100-110. PubMed ID: 36762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. '
    Chakraborti S; Hatti K; Srinivasan N
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 34202053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PHOENIX: a scoring function for affinity prediction derived using high-resolution crystal structures and calorimetry measurements.
    Tang YT; Marshall GR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):214-28. PubMed ID: 21214225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Polder maps: improving OMIT maps by excluding bulk solvent.
    Liebschner D; Afonine PV; Moriarty NW; Poon BK; Sobolev OV; Terwilliger TC; Adams PD
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Feb; 73(Pt 2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28177311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of small-molecule structures to complement protein-ligand crystal structures in drug discovery.
    Groom CR; Cole JC
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2017 Mar; 73(Pt 3):240-245. PubMed ID: 28291759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.