243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25666763)
1. Patient outcomes for a minimally invasive approach to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis: is microendoscopic or microscopic decompressive laminotomy the less invasive surgery?
Fujimoto T; Taniwaki T; Tahata S; Nakamura T; Mizuta H
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Apr; 131():21-5. PubMed ID: 25666763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis.
Khoo LT; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S146-54. PubMed ID: 12234442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
Soliman HM
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Chen WC; Chen PQ
Eur Spine J; 2009 May; 18(5):672-8. PubMed ID: 19238459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous Endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, Unilateral Approach for the Lumbar Canal or Lateral Recess Stenosis.
Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Jun JH
World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e129-e137. PubMed ID: 29425979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative myelography in minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Wang JL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E117-24. PubMed ID: 22739384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note.
Ikuta K; Arima J; Tanaka T; Oga M; Nakano S; Sasaki K; Goshi K; Yo M; Fukagawa S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 May; 2(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 15945442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.
Heo DH; Lee DC; Park CK
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E9. PubMed ID: 31042664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the drain placement technique affect the amount of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis?
Merter A; Shibayama M
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(3):2309499019869023. PubMed ID: 31451095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
