These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

655 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25667145)

  • 1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
    Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
    Zahoor H; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Winger DG; Gibson MK; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25454907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.
    Klevebro F; Scandavini CM; Kamiya S; Nilsson M; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29897443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.
    Khan M; Muzaffar A; Syed AA; Khatak S; Khan AR; Ashraf MI
    Updates Surg; 2016 Dec; 68(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 27629484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
    Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.
    Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
    World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
    Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Sweet esophagectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma].
    Liu CQ; Xie MR; Guo MF; Sun XH; Wu HR; Sun XX; Xu MQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 54(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27938582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Smithers BM; Gotley DC; Martin I; Thomas JM
    Ann Surg; 2007 Feb; 245(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 17245176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation yields excellent long-term survival outcomes with minimal morbidity.
    Woodard GA; Crockard JC; Clary-Macy C; Zoon-Besselink CT; Jones K; Korn WM; Ko AH; Gottschalk AR; Rogers SJ; Jablons DM
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 114(7):838-847. PubMed ID: 27569043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
    Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
    Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.