742 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25667426)
1. Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages.
Onbaşılar EE; Ünal N; Erdem E; Kocakaya A; Yaranoğlu B
Poult Sci; 2015 Apr; 94(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 25667426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens.
Singh R; Cheng KM; Silversides FG
Poult Sci; 2009 Feb; 88(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 19151338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes.
Vits A; Weitzenbürger D; Hamann H; Distl O
Poult Sci; 2005 Oct; 84(10):1511-9. PubMed ID: 16335118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages.
Tactacan GB; Guenter W; Lewis NJ; Rodriguez-Lecompte JC; House JD
Poult Sci; 2009 Apr; 88(4):698-707. PubMed ID: 19276411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range).
Yilmaz Dikmen B; İpek A; Şahan Ü; Petek M; Sözcü A
Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 26994200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Keel fracture changed the behavior and reduced the welfare, production performance, and egg quality in laying hens housed individually in furnished cages.
Wei H; Bi Y; Xin H; Pan L; Liu R; Li X; Li J; Zhang R; Bao J
Poult Sci; 2020 Jul; 99(7):3334-3342. PubMed ID: 32616227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage.
Hester PY; Enneking SA; Jefferson-Moore KY; Einstein ME; Cheng HW; Rubin DA
Poult Sci; 2013 Feb; 92(2):310-20. PubMed ID: 23300294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Furnished cages for laying hens: study of the effects of group size and litter provision on laying location, zootechnical performance and egg quality.
Huneau-Salaün A; Guinebretière M; Taktak A; Huonnic D; Michel V
Animal; 2011 May; 5(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 22440030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality.
Guesdon V; Ahmed AM; Mallet S; Faure JM; Nys Y
Br Poult Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16546790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.
Widowski TM; Caston LJ; Hunniford ME; Cooley L; Torrey S
Poult Sci; 2017 Sep; 96(11):3805-3815. PubMed ID: 29050408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of cage type on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle.
Onbaşılar EE; Kahraman M; Güngör ÖF; Kocakaya A; Karakan T; Pirpanahi M; Doğan B; Metin D; Akan M; Şehu A; Erbay Elibol FK; Yalçın S
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Nov; 52(6):3713-3724. PubMed ID: 33001365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Egg quality in furnished cages for laying hens--effects of crack reduction measures and hybrid.
Wall H; Tauson R
Poult Sci; 2002 Mar; 81(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 11902409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of toe-clipping and stocking density on laying hen performance.
Goodling AC; Satterlee DG; Cerniglia GJ; Jacobs-Perry LA
Poult Sci; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1722-31. PubMed ID: 6483737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effects of design on behaviour and welfare.
Appleby MC; Smith SF; Hughes BO
Br Poult Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(5):835-47. PubMed ID: 8156422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of dietary energy content on the performance of laying hens in furnished and conventional cages.
Valkonen E; Venäläinen E; Rossow L; Valaja J
Poult Sci; 2008 May; 87(5):844-52. PubMed ID: 18420974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nesting behavior of Hy-Line hens in modified enriched colony cages.
Hunniford ME; Woolcott C; Siegford J; Widowski TM
Poult Sci; 2017 Jun; 96(6):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 28008129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of feed particle size and feed form on productive performance, egg quality, gastrointestinal tract traits, digestive enzymes, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of laying hens reared in enriched cages.
Ege G; Bozkurt M; Koçer B; Tüzün AE; Uygun M; Alkan G
Poult Sci; 2019 Sep; 98(9):3787-3801. PubMed ID: 30839089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Discussion of actual legal minimum requirements for feeder space and perch length in laying hen husbandry in the light of the body widths measured in Lohmann Selected Leghorn and Lohmann Brown laying hens].
Briese A; Spindler B
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2013; 126(3-4):163-8. PubMed ID: 23540200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
