These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25668773)

  • 1. Invariant texture perception is harder with synthetic textures: Implications for models of texture processing.
    Balas B; Conlin C
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt B):271-9. PubMed ID: 25668773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric texture model based on deep convolutional features closely matches texture appearance for humans.
    Wallis TSA; Funke CM; Ecker AS; Gatys LA; Wichmann FA; Bethge M
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):5. PubMed ID: 28983571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Visual N1 Is Sensitive to Deviations from Natural Texture Appearance.
    Balas B; Conlin C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136471. PubMed ID: 26355681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrasting the processes of texture segmentation and discrimination with static and phase-reversing stimuli.
    Norman LJ; Heywood CA; Kentridge RW
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(18):2039-47. PubMed ID: 21843544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Texture synthesis and perception: using computational models to study texture representations in the human visual system.
    Balas BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 15964047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of illumination direction in images of 3-D convex objects: influence of surface materials and light fields.
    Khang BG; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM
    Perception; 2006; 35(5):625-45. PubMed ID: 16836054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond fourth-order texture discrimination: generation of extreme-order and statistically-balanced textures.
    Tyler CW
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(18):2187-99. PubMed ID: 15183686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response priming evidence for feedforward processing of snake contours but not of ladder contours and textures.
    Schmidt F; Vancleef K
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():174-182. PubMed ID: 25771400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opposing effects of selectivity and invariance in peripheral vision.
    Ziemba CM; Simoncelli EP
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4597. PubMed ID: 34321483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ecologically valid combinations of first- and second-order surface markings facilitate texture discrimination.
    Johnson AP; Prins N; Kingdom FA; Baker CL
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2281-90. PubMed ID: 17618668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-level contrast statistics are diagnostic of invariance of natural textures.
    Groen II; Ghebreab S; Lamme VA; Scholte HS
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2012; 6():34. PubMed ID: 22701419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Texture discrimination based on global feature alignments.
    Phillips F; Todd JT
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):6. PubMed ID: 20884555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote effects of highlights on gloss perception.
    Berzhanskaya J; Swaminathan G; Beck J; Mingolla E
    Perception; 2005; 34(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 15991693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction of luminance and higher-order statistics in texture discrimination.
    Victor JD; Chubb C; Conte MM
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(3):311-28. PubMed ID: 15607348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of surface slant from oriented textures.
    Saunders JA; Backus BT
    J Vis; 2006 Aug; 6(9):882-97. PubMed ID: 17083282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Texture sparseness, but not local phase structure, impairs second-order segmentation.
    Zavitz E; Baker CL
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():45-55. PubMed ID: 23942289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic texture segmentation in early vision: evidence from priming experiments.
    Schubö A; Meinecke C
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2378-89. PubMed ID: 17651778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Versatile perceptual learning of textures after variable exposures.
    Hussain Z; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 61():89-94. PubMed ID: 22266193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis and Synthesis of Natural Texture Perception From Visual Evoked Potentials.
    Orima T; Motoyoshi I
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():698940. PubMed ID: 34381330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.