These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669049)
1. Redundancy gain in binocular rivalry. Ritchie KL; Bannerman RL; Sahraie A Perception; 2014; 43(12):1316-28. PubMed ID: 25669049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry. Silver MA; Logothetis NK Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1675-92. PubMed ID: 15136003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shifting spatial attention makes you flip: Exogenous visual attention triggers perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry. Paffen CL; Van der Stigchel S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1237-43. PubMed ID: 20601704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatio-temporal dynamics of the visual system revealed in binocular rivalry. Taya F; Mogi K Neurosci Lett; 2005 Jun 10-17; 381(1-2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15882791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer. O'Shea RP; Corballis PM Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 15581923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm. Desjardins S; Braun CM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Chong SC; Blake R Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1794-803. PubMed ID: 16368126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles. Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate. Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When crowding meets binocular rivalry: challenges for object perception. Kim S; Shin E; Chong SC Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 76():134-43. PubMed ID: 23200867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing. Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes. O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. Stuit SM; Cass J; Paffen CL; Alais D J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):17.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The temporal course of suppression during binocular rivalry. Norman HF; Norman JF; Bilotta J Perception; 2000; 29(7):831-41. PubMed ID: 11064804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential effects of visual attention and working memory on binocular rivalry. Scocchia L; Valsecchi M; Gegenfurtner KR; Triesch J J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):13. PubMed ID: 24879860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]