163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669057)
1. Menopausal status strongly influences the utility of predictive models in differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: an external validation of selected diagnostic tools.
Moszynski R; Zywica P; Wojtowicz A; Szubert S; Sajdak S; Stachowiak A; Dyczkowski K; Wygralak M; Szpurek D
Ginekol Pol; 2014 Dec; 85(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 25669057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses.
Van Gorp T; Veldman J; Van Calster B; Cadron I; Leunen K; Amant F; Timmerman D; Vergote I
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 48(11):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22226481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Utility of Risk Models to Refer Patients with Adnexal Masses to Specialized Oncology Care: Multicenter External Validation Using Decision Curve Analysis.
Wynants L; Timmerman D; Verbakel JY; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Froyman W; Guerriero S; Rossi A; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Calster B
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 23(17):5082-5090. PubMed ID: 28512173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathological diagnoses of adnexal masses: which parameters are relevant in preoperative assessment?
Terzic M; Dotlic J; Brndusic N; Arsenovic N; Likic I; Ladjevic N; Maricic S; Andrijasevic S
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):700-8. PubMed ID: 24191504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm versus Risk Malignancy Index-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chacón E; Dasí J; Caballero C; Alcázar JL
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):591-598. PubMed ID: 31311023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of false negative results of subjective ultrasonography assessment of adnexal masses.
Moszynski R; Szpurek D; Szubert S; Sajdak S
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 23668055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.
Karlsen MA; Sandhu N; Høgdall C; Christensen IJ; Nedergaard L; Lundvall L; Engelholm SA; Pedersen AT; Hartwell D; Lydolph M; Laursen IA; Høgdall EV
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 22835718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.
Kaijser J; Van Gorp T; Van Hoorde K; Van Holsbeke C; Sayasneh A; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 23360924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.
Kaijser J; Bourne T; Valentin L; Sayasneh A; Van Holsbeke C; Vergote I; Testa AC; Franchi D; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 23065859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):841-8. PubMed ID: 11503920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
