488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669080)
1. [Head extension during laryngoscopy for obtaining a best glottic view: comparison of the McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes].
Kita S; Higashi K; Matsuo M; Sano H; Aoyama K; Takenaka I
Masui; 2014 Dec; 63(12):1300-5. PubMed ID: 25669080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh, and Miller laryngoscopes.
Hastings RH; Vigil AC; Hanna R; Yang BY; Sartoris DJ
Anesthesiology; 1995 Apr; 82(4):859-69. PubMed ID: 7717556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury.
Watts AD; Gelb AW; Bach DB; Pelz DM
Anesthesiology; 1997 Dec; 87(6):1335-42. PubMed ID: 9416718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 18477276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tracheal Intubation with a McGrath® Series 5 Video Laryngoscope by Novice Personnel in a Cervical-immobilized Manikin.
Choi JW; Kim JA; Jung HJ; Kim WH
J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 50(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 26432080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial.
Karaman T; Dogru S; Karaman S; Demir S; Kaya Z; Suren M; Arici S; Kahveci M; Alim S
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Nov; 34():358-64. PubMed ID: 27687410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Movement of the upper cervical spine during laryngoscopy: a comparison of the Bonfils intubation fibrescope and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Rudolph C; Schneider JP; Wallenborn J; Schaffranietz L
Anaesthesia; 2005 Jul; 60(7):668-72. PubMed ID: 15960717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.
Hindman BJ; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; From RP; Todd MM
Anesthesiology; 2014 Aug; 121(2):260-71. PubMed ID: 24739996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):1050-5. PubMed ID: 17845658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tracheal tube placement in patients with a good glottic view at direct laryngoscopy.
Yao WL; Wan L; Xu H; Qian W; Wang XR; Tian YK; Zhang CH
Anaesthesia; 2015 Jul; 70(7):810-7. PubMed ID: 25721326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.
Taylor AM; Peck M; Launcelott S; Hung OR; Law JA; MacQuarrie K; McKeen D; George RB; Ngan J
Anaesthesia; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 23121470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. McGrath Video Laryngoscopy Facilitates Routine Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Comparison With Macintosh Laryngoscopy.
Kwak HJ; Lee SY; Lee SY; Cho SH; Kim HS; Kim JY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 26279490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
Paik H; Park HP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy.
Noppens RR; Möbus S; Heid F; Schmidtmann I; Werner C; Piepho T
Anaesthesia; 2010 Jul; 65(7):716-20. PubMed ID: 20528841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists.
Walker L; Brampton W; Halai M; Hoy C; Lee E; Scott I; McLernon DJ
Br J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 103(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19605408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.
Wetsch WA; Spelten O; Hellmich M; Carlitscheck M; Padosch SA; Lier H; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 22155448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the McGRATH
Kim JY; Park S; Oh M; Choi JB; John HJ; Lee SK; Choi YH
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
