These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669261)

  • 1. Fusion of spatially separated vowel formant cues.
    Takanen M; Raitio T; Santala O; Alku P; Pulkki V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4508. PubMed ID: 25669261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The verbal transformation effect and the perceptual organization of speech: influence of formant transitions and F0-contour continuity.
    Stachurski M; Summers RJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():22-31. PubMed ID: 25620314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural realignment of spatially separated sound components.
    Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Alku P; Pulkki V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3356-65. PubMed ID: 26093425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of an Open Jaw Posture on Vowel Perception in the Aging Voice.
    Mautner HD
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):772.e23-772.e32. PubMed ID: 26743608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.
    Chintanpalli A; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 24116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can listeners hear how many singers are singing? The effect of listener's experience, vibrato, onset, and formant frequency on the perception of number of simultaneous singers.
    Erickson ML; Gaskill CS
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22921292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Melodic contour identification and sentence recognition using sung speech.
    Crew JD; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL347-51. PubMed ID: 26428838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Room and head coloration can induce obligatory stream segregation.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 24993189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.
    Mamo SK; Grose JH; Buss E
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():201-209. PubMed ID: 26368029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.