These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669261)

  • 21. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy.
    Hassan DM
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21047293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening.
    Vestergaard MD; Fyson NR; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):429-39. PubMed ID: 21786910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.
    Won JH; Tremblay K; Clinard CG; Wright RA; Sagi E; Svirsky M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26826999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of exposure to a single vowel on talker normalization for vowels.
    Morton JR; Sommers MS; Lulich SM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1443-51. PubMed ID: 25786955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speaking fundamental frequency and vowel formant frequencies: effects on perception of gender.
    Gelfer MP; Bennett QE
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 23415148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. F2 slope as a Perceptual Cue for the Front-Back Contrast in Standard Southern British English.
    Chládková K; Hamann S; Williams D; Hellmuth S
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):377-398. PubMed ID: 28915781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of formant amplitude in the perception of /i/ and /u/.
    Kiefte M; Enright T; Marshall L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2611-21. PubMed ID: 20370042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender Perception After Raising Vowel Fundamental and Formant Frequencies: Considerations for Oral Resonance Research.
    Gallena SJK; Stickels B; Stickels E
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 28844651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting contrast effects following reliable spectral properties in speech perception.
    Stilp CE; Anderson PW; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3466-76. PubMed ID: 26093434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cue-weighting in the perception of intervocalic stop voicing in European Portuguese.
    Pape D; Jesus LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1334. PubMed ID: 25190406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.
    Mitsuya T; Munhall KG; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2758. PubMed ID: 28464659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual adaptation to gender and expressive properties in speech: the role of fundamental frequency.
    Hubbard DJ; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2367-76. PubMed ID: 23556602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.