These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25669477)
1. Peer review of cancer multidisciplinary teams: is it acceptable in Australia? Slavova-Azmanova NS; Johnson CE; Platell C; Bydder S; Saunders CM Med J Aust; 2015 Feb; 202(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 25669477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-method evaluation of the implementation of a cancer teamwork assessment and feedback improvement programme (MDT-FIT) across a large integrated cancer system. Taylor C; Harris J; Stenner K; Sevdalis N; Green SAJ Cancer Med; 2021 Feb; 10(4):1240-1252. PubMed ID: 33480191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science. Robinson TE; Janssen A; Harnett P; Museth KE; Provan PJ; Hills DJ; Shaw T Aust Health Rev; 2017 Jul; 41(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 27372543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork. Taylor C; Brown K; Lamb B; Harris J; Sevdalis N; Green JS Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 19(13):4019-27. PubMed ID: 22820934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings. Janssen A; Robinson T; Brunner M; Harnett P; Museth KE; Shaw T BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):444. PubMed ID: 29898716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective. Jalil R; Ahmed M; Green JS; Sevdalis N Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 23500030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using peer observers to assess the quality of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative proof of concept study. Harris J; Green JS; Sevdalis N; Taylor C J Multidiscip Healthc; 2014; 7():355-63. PubMed ID: 25143743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a peer-review framework for cancer multidisciplinary meetings. Johnson CE; Slavova-Azmanova N; Saunders C Intern Med J; 2017 May; 47(5):529-535. PubMed ID: 28105750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach. Taylor C; Atkins L; Richardson A; Tarrant R; Ramirez AJ BMC Cancer; 2012 May; 12():202. PubMed ID: 22642614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reciprocal peer review for quality improvement: an ethnographic case study of the Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project. Aveling EL; Martin G; Jiménez García S; Martin L; Herbert G; Armstrong N; Dixon-Woods M; Woolhouse I BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Dec; 21(12):1034-41. PubMed ID: 22879446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change. Rankin NM; Lai M; Miller D; Beale P; Spigelman A; Prest G; Turley K; Simes J Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Feb; 14(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28949100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical impact of data feedback at lung cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A mixed methods study. Stone E; Rankin NM; Vinod SK; Nagarajah M; Donnelly C; Currow DC; Fong KM; Phillips JL; Shaw T Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 16(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 31721458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership? Lamb B; Payne H; Vincent C; Sevdalis N; Green JS J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(6):1200-6. PubMed ID: 20666886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study. Rankin NM; Collett GK; Brown CM; Shaw TJ; White KM; Beale PJ; Trevena LJ; Anderiesz C; Barnes DJ BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018629. PubMed ID: 29288182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consensus minimum data set for lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: Results of a Delphi process. Stone E; Rankin N; Phillips J; Fong K; Currow DC; Miller A; Largey G; Zielinski R; Flynn P; Shaw T Respirology; 2018 Oct; 23(10):927-934. PubMed ID: 29641841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changing from face-to-face to virtual meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a mixed-methods study exploring the impact on cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. McInnerney D; Chung D; Mughal M; Onifade A; Holden D; Goodman J; Birchall M; Peake MD; Quaife SL BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e064911. PubMed ID: 37076166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Lamb BW; Brown KF; Nagpal K; Vincent C; Green JS; Sevdalis N Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2116-25. PubMed ID: 21442345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tool to improve the performance of multidisciplinary teams in cancer care. Evans L; Donovan B; Liu Y; Shaw T; Harnett P BMJ Open Qual; 2019; 8(2):e000435. PubMed ID: 31259279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]