BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25671249)

  • 1. Breast-density legislation--practical considerations.
    Slanetz PJ; Freer PE; Birdwell RL
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Feb; 372(7):593-5. PubMed ID: 25671249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent findings may inform breast density notification laws.
    Trubo R
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):452-3. PubMed ID: 25647190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast Density Legislation Update.
    Allen L; Pike JH
    Radiol Manage; 2015; 37(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 26710550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Summaries for Patients. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations From the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):. PubMed ID: 26756910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
    Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imperfect correlation of mammographic and clinical breast tissue density.
    Alipour S; Bayani L; Saberi A; Alikhassi A; Hosseini L; Eslami B
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(6):3685-8. PubMed ID: 23886166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting recall rate and false positive fraction in breast cancer screening with breast tomosynthesis - A statistical approach.
    Rosso A; Lång K; Petersson IF; Zackrisson S
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 26365133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Rafferty EA; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Miller DP
    JAMA; 2016 Apr; 315(16):1784-6. PubMed ID: 27115381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.
    Parris T; Wakefield D; Frimmer H
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
    Siu AL;
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 26757170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conundrum of explaining breast density to patients.
    Marcus EN; Yepes M
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2013 Dec; 80(12):761-5. PubMed ID: 24307159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dense Breasts: What Do Our Patients Need to Be Told and Why?
    Throckmorton AD; Rhodes DJ; Hughes KS; Degnim AC; Dickson-Witmer D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3119-27. PubMed ID: 27401446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
    Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Federal Requirements to Inform Patients About Breast Density: Will They Help Patients?
    Keating NL; Pace LE
    JAMA; 2019 Jun; 321(23):2275-2276. PubMed ID: 31070674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early life factors and adult mammographic density.
    Lokate M; van Duijnhoven FJ; van den Berg SW; Peeters PH; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1771-8. PubMed ID: 23817886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
    Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages.
    Nguyen T; Levy G; Poncelet E; Le Thanh T; Prolongeau JF; Phalippou J; Massoni F; Laurent N
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):843-59. PubMed ID: 26275829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic Breast Density as a Predictor of Radiological Findings Requiring Further Investigation.
    Nevler A; Shabtai E; Rosin D; Hoffman A; Gutman M; Shabtai M
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 26964277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.