These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25672532)

  • 1. [Study on the effect of setting the region of interest for exposure index computing].
    Hirose S; Matsuzawa H; Hirose A; Kawamoto K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Jan; 71(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25672532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
    Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
    Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Update on digital imaging.
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):1-95. PubMed ID: 2299697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Investigation of an Optimum Determination Method of Exposure Index for Posterior-Anterior Chest Radiographs Using an Auto Exposure Control].
    Yanagita S; Imahana M; Gomi T; Nishiki M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 27000672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DICOM Metadata repository for technical information in digital medical images.
    Källman HE; Halsius E; Olsson M; Stenström M
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 18720055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality.
    Eller A; Wuest W; Scharf M; Brand M; Achenbach S; Uder M; Lell MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2386-91. PubMed ID: 24050878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
    Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital systems require x-ray charts too.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(4):354. PubMed ID: 8778917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital image intensifier radiography--what dose for what clinical problem?].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jan; 2(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 1547288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.