These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25672532)

  • 21. Digital scanned projection radiography: optimization of image characteristics.
    Kalender WA; Hubener KH; Jass W
    Radiology; 1983 Oct; 149(1):299-303. PubMed ID: 6611938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementation of region-of-interest fluoroscopy by using the road mapping mode of a real-time digital radiographic unit.
    Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Guterman LR; Hopkins LN; Wakhloo AK; Fletcher LM; Massoumzadeh P
    Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1465-70. PubMed ID: 8577969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L
    Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique].
    Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-resolution skeletal radiography: image quality and clinical applications.
    Genant HK; Doi K
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1978; 7(7):1-62. PubMed ID: 343997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of an automated adaptive unsharp masking technique in digital chest radiographs].
    Abe K; Katsuragawa S; Sasaki Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 1561056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Effect of tube voltage on digital chest radiograph for phantom and occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Duan JH; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 31(9):671-4. PubMed ID: 24064123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital radiography in chest imaging.
    Pirronti T; Meduri A; Natale L; Sallustio G
    Rays; 1992; 17(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 1289967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical advances in chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Letter: Exposure reduction using new screen/film combination.
    Adran GM; Langmead WA; Crooks HE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Mar; 48(567):233-4. PubMed ID: 1125554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
    Seeram E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Technical note: Four-year experience with utilization of DICOM metadata analytics in clinical digital radiography practice.
    Long Z; Walz-Flannigan AI; Littrell LA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):831-836. PubMed ID: 36542418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.