199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25672748)
1. Power analysis of artificial selection experiments using efficient whole genome simulation of quantitative traits.
Kessner D; Novembre J
Genetics; 2015 Apr; 199(4):991-1005. PubMed ID: 25672748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of Quantitative Trait Architecture on Detection Power in Short-Term Artificial Selection Experiments.
Lou RN; Therkildsen NO; Messer PW
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Sep; 10(9):3213-3227. PubMed ID: 32646912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the Power to Identify the Genetic Basis of Complex Traits with Evolve and Resequence Studies.
Vlachos C; Kofler R
Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Dec; 36(12):2890-2905. PubMed ID: 31400203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele.
Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Theoretical efficiency of multiple-trait quantitative trait loci-assisted selection.
Togashi K; Lin CY
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Feb; 127(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 20074187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consequences of selection for improving production traits on the frequency of deleterious alleles for fitness.
Kearney JF; Navarro P; Haley CS; Villanueva B
J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):850-9. PubMed ID: 18997080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The power to detect quantitative trait loci using resequenced, experimentally evolved populations of diploid, sexual organisms.
Baldwin-Brown JG; Long AD; Thornton KR
Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):1040-55. PubMed ID: 24441104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using mating designs to uncover QTL and the genetic architecture of complex traits.
Verhoeven KJ; Jannink JL; McIntyre LM
Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Feb; 96(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 16304603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective sweep at a quantitative trait locus in the presence of background genetic variation.
Chevin LM; Hospital F
Genetics; 2008 Nov; 180(3):1645-60. PubMed ID: 18832353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection.
Kelly JK
Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 17607507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Powerful, efficient QTL mapping in Drosophila melanogaster using bulked phenotyping and pooled sequencing.
Macdonald SJ; Cloud-Richardson KM; Sims-West DJ; Long AD
Genetics; 2022 Mar; 220(3):. PubMed ID: 35100395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity.
Vilas A; Pérez-Figueroa A; Quesada H; Caballero A
Mol Ecol; 2015 Sep; 24(17):4419-32. PubMed ID: 26222582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient marker-based recurrent selection for multiple quantitative trait loci.
Hospital F; Goldringer I; Openshaw S
Genet Res; 2000 Jun; 75(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 10893871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power of QTL mapping experiments in commercial Atlantic salmon populations, exploiting linkage and linkage disequilibrium and effect of limited recombination in males.
Hayes BJ; Gjuvsland A; Omholt S
Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Jul; 97(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16685283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic Mapping by Bulk Segregant Analysis in Drosophila: Experimental Design and Simulation-Based Inference.
Pool JE
Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1295-1306. PubMed ID: 27655945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Beavis Effect in Next-Generation Mapping Panels in
King EG; Long AD
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1643-1652. PubMed ID: 28592647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of quantitative trait loci from frequency changes of marker alleles under selection.
Keightley PD; Bulfield G
Genet Res; 1993 Dec; 62(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 8157171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: Mapping spontaneous mutations affecting sensory bristle number.
Mackay TF; Lyman RF; Lawrence F
Genetics; 2005 Aug; 170(4):1723-35. PubMed ID: 15944368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mapping quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibrium: marker- versus trait-based methods.
Tenesa A; Visscher PM; Carothers AD; Knott SA
Behav Genet; 2005 Mar; 35(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 15685434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
