198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25672748)
41. Artificial Selection to Increase the Phenotypic Variance in g
Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):707-723. PubMed ID: 29053361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Artificial Selection Response due to Polygenic Adaptation from a Multilocus, Multiallelic Genetic Architecture.
Zan Y; Sheng Z; Lillie M; Rönnegård L; Honaker CF; Siegel PB; Carlborg Ö
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Oct; 34(10):2678-2689. PubMed ID: 28957504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Expected effects on protein yield of marker-assisted selection at quantitative trait loci affecting milk yield and milk protein percentage.
Lipkin E; Bagnato A; Soller M
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2857-63. PubMed ID: 18565943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Power of IRT in GWAS: successful QTL mapping of sum score phenotypes depends on interplay between risk allele frequency, variance explained by the risk allele, and test characteristics.
van den Berg SM; Service SK
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 36(8):882-9. PubMed ID: 22965845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of breeding strategies for polledness in dairy cattle using a newly developed simulation framework for quantitative and Mendelian traits.
Scheper C; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Dressel H; Swalve H; König S
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):50. PubMed ID: 27357942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Further insights of the variance component method for detecting QTL in livestock and aquacultural species: relaxing the assumption of additive effects.
Martinez V
Genet Sel Evol; 2008; 40(6):585-606. PubMed ID: 18990353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimizing selection on multiple identified quantitative trait loci in population with overlapping generations.
Tang GQ; Li XW
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 May; 33(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 16722338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.
Avila V; Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; Hill WG; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):1974-87. PubMed ID: 24689841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sequential quantitative trait locus mapping in experimental crosses.
Satagopan JM; Sen S; Churchill GA
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article12. PubMed ID: 17474878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.
Doekes HP; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Hiemstra SJ; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):15. PubMed ID: 29642838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits via selection followed by inbreeding.
Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Sep; 123(3):407-418. PubMed ID: 30967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effects of selection on linkage analysis for quantitative traits.
Mackinnon MJ; Georges MA
Genetics; 1992 Dec; 132(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1459434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection.
Parts L; Cubillos FA; Warringer J; Jain K; Salinas F; Bumpstead SJ; Molin M; Zia A; Simpson JT; Quail MA; Moses A; Louis EJ; Durbin R; Liti G
Genome Res; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1131-8. PubMed ID: 21422276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection.
Kelly JK
Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 17607507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Resampling QTL effects in the QTL sign test leads to incongruous sensitivity to variance in effect size.
Rice DP; Townsend JP
G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Aug; 2(8):905-11. PubMed ID: 22908039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Optimization of a crossing system using mate selection.
Li Y; van der Werf JH; Kinghorn BP
Genet Sel Evol; 2006; 38(2):147-65. PubMed ID: 16492372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Highly Parallel Genomic Selection Response in Replicated Drosophila melanogaster Populations with Reduced Genetic Variation.
Burny C; Nolte V; Dolezal M; Schlötterer C
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34694407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. forqs: forward-in-time simulation of recombination, quantitative traits and selection.
Kessner D; Novembre J
Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):576-7. PubMed ID: 24336146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection.
Le Corre V; Kremer A
Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1205-19. PubMed ID: 12871925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
