BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25673585)

  • 1. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples.
    Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
    Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
    Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology: comparison with conventional cytology.
    Patel C; Ullal A; Roberts M; Brady J; Birch P; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 19207308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsatisfactory rate in liquid-based cervical samples as compared to conventional smears: A study from tertiary care hospital.
    Gupta N; Bhar VS; Rajwanshi A; Suri V
    Cytojournal; 2016; 13():14. PubMed ID: 27382408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
    Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
    J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
    Cox JT
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
    Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®).
    Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Role of cytological test for cervices to identify human papillomavirus in the screening program on serious cervical lesion].
    Wang GP; Li RZ; Wu LN; Li J; Liu ZH; Wang C; Zhou YQ; Weng LM; Wu RF
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 30(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 19957634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush Combi.
    Depuydt CE; Benoy IH; Bailleul EJ; Vandepitte J; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 17168921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applicability of On-Site Evaluation of Cervical Cytology Smears Stained with Toluidine Blue to Reduce Unsatisfactory Results.
    Tummidi S; Shankaralingappa A; Sharmila V
    Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 36215977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study.
    Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S
    Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PAP smear and liquid based cytology as a screening method for cervical carcinoma.
    Khakwani M; Parveen R; Azhar M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2022; 38(7):1827-1831. PubMed ID: 36246719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
    Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
    Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
    Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Papanicolaou Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening: An Experience From Pakistan.
    Hashmi AA; Naz S; Ahmed O; Yaqeen SR; Irfan M; Asif MG; Kamal A; Faridi N
    Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12293. PubMed ID: 33520497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systemic cervical cytology training and quality control programs can improve the interpretation of Papanicolaou tests.
    Xie F; Li Z; Zhang L; Zhang H; Qi D; Zhao D; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhao C
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 30929756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
    Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.