214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25673585)
21. Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-SurePath in the Ontario screening program.
Colgan TJ; McLachlin CM; Cotterchio M; Howlett R; Seidenfeld AM; Mai VM
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 15481083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
Sykes PH; Harker DY; Miller A; Whitehead M; Neal H; Wells JE; Peddie D
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study.
Rimiene J; Petronyte J; Gudleviciene Z; Smailyte G; Krasauskaite I; Laurinavicius A
Cytojournal; 2010 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 20376176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Could alarmingly high rates of negative diagnoses in remote rural areas be minimized with liquid-based cytology? Preliminary results from the RODEO Study Team.
Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo C; Haikel RL; Saccheto T; Campacci N; Mauad EC; Longatto-Filho A;
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23221353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cervical Cytology Reporting Rates from China's Largest College of American Pathologists-Certified Laboratory with a Focus on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cytology and Its Histopathological Follow-Up Results.
Zheng B; Li Z; Liang X; Austin RM; Chen C; Zhao C
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 26655168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials.
Castle PE; Bulten J; Confortini M; Klinkhamer P; Pellegrini A; Siebers AG; Ronco G; Arbyn M
BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1067-73. PubMed ID: 20604775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening by molecular Pap-transformation of gynecologic cytology.
Barodawala SM; Chadha K; Kavishwar V; Murthy A; Shetye S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 May; 47(5):374-381. PubMed ID: 30468313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High concordance of results of testing for human papillomavirus in cervicovaginal samples collected by two methods, with comparison of a novel self-sampling device to a conventional endocervical brush.
Brink AA; Meijer CJ; Wiegerinck MA; Nieboer TE; Kruitwagen RF; van Kemenade F; Fransen Daalmeijer N; Hesselink AT; Berkhof J; Snijders PJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2518-23. PubMed ID: 16825374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy.
Maccallini V; Angeloni C; Caraceni D; Fortunato C; Venditti MA; Di Gabriele G; Antonelli C; Lattanzi A; Puliti D; Ciatto S; Confortini M; Sani C; Zappa M
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 18833819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?
Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of the Cellslide
Michelow P; Sherrin A; Rossouw L; Mohaleamolla S; Evans D; Swarts A; Rakhombe N; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
Afr J Lab Med; 2016; 5(1):278. PubMed ID: 28879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analytical performance of RNA isolated from BD SurePath™ cervical cytology specimens by the PreTect™ HPV-Proofer assay.
Dixon EP; Grønn P; King LM; Passineau H; Doobay H; Skomedal H; Hariri J; Hay SN; Brown CA; Fischer TJ; Malinowski DP
J Virol Methods; 2012 Nov; 185(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 22820075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical screening in Western Kazakhstan: Liquid-based cytology 'Cell Scan' versus azur-eosin staining.
Balmagambetova S; Gabutti G; Koyshybaev A; Acuti Martellucci C; Urazayev O; Sakiyeva K; Bekova K
J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31744375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pap Test Reporting Rates for Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology from the Largest Academic Women's Hospital in China: Analysis of 1,248,785 Pap Test Reports.
Tao X; Austin RM; Zhang H; Zhang L; Xiao J; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhao C
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 26789332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Our experience in using liquid based cytology in cervical screening (LBC)].
Tsonev A; Ivanov S; Kovachev E; Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2013; 52 Suppl 1():8-10. PubMed ID: 24294738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conventional Direct Smear Yields Diagnostic Indicators of Gastric-Type Mucinous Carcinoma Compared with Cytomorphological Features Identified by Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology.
Ryu A; Nagata S; Kubo C; Ueda Y; Tanada S; Idota A; Kamiura S; Honma K; Yamasaki T
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 33176300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
