These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25674572)

  • 41. Legislators' views on tobacco policy: are there regional differences in Kentucky?
    Hahn EJ; Rayens MK
    South Med J; 2002 Mar; 95(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 11902700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Enhancing the Capacity of Policy-Makers to Develop Evidence-Informed Policy Brief on Infectious Diseases of Poverty in Nigeria.
    Uneke CJ; Ezeoha AE; Uro-Chukwu H; Ezeonu CT; Ogbu O; Onwe F; Edoga C
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2015 May; 4(9):599-610. PubMed ID: 26340489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Australian health policy makers' priorities for research synthesis: a survey.
    Cumpston MS; Tavender EJ; Buchan HA; Gruen RL
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 22951094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. State legislators' beliefs about legislation that restricts youth access to tobacco products.
    Gottlieb NH; Goldstein AO; Flynn BS; Cohen EJ; Bauman KE; Solomon LJ; Munger MC; Dana GS; McMorris LE
    Health Educ Behav; 2003 Apr; 30(2):209-24. PubMed ID: 12693524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Where there's smoke there's money: tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting.
    Luke DA; Krauss M
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Dec; 27(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 15556735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A review of state legislation and a state legislator survey related to not-for-profit hospital tax exemption and health care for the indigent.
    Jervis KJ
    J Health Care Finance; 2005; 32(2):36-71. PubMed ID: 18975725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effective state EMS lobbying: it's all in the plan.
    Haugen M
    Emerg Med Serv; 2000 Jun; 29(6):22. PubMed ID: 11067458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Participation and argument in legislative debate on statewide smoking restrictions.
    Apollonio DE; Lopipero P; Bero LA
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2007 Oct; 5():12. PubMed ID: 17953767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Policy considerations for the introduction and promotion of the lactational amenorrhea method: advantages and disadvantages of LAM.
    Kennedy KI; Kotelchuck M
    J Hum Lact; 1998 Sep; 14(3):191-203. PubMed ID: 10205427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. State variation in health care spending and the politics of state Medicaid policy.
    Lukens G
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2014 Dec; 39(6):1213-51. PubMed ID: 25248962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. State mental health agency officials' preferences for and sources of behavioral health research.
    Purtle J; Lê-Scherban F; Nelson KL; Shattuck PT; Proctor EK; Brownson RC
    Psychol Serv; 2020; 17(S1):93-97. PubMed ID: 31192673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evidence-based Training to Improve Communication between Health Advocates and State Policymakers.
    Chrisman M; Hampton N
    Soc Work Public Health; 2022 Apr; 37(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 34865610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda.
    Huber LM; Bodlos A; Graf E; Meyer TM
    Party Politics; 2022 Mar; 28(2):365-376. PubMed ID: 35281722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Resolving Contested Elections: The Limited Power of Post-Vote Vote-Choice Data.
    Glynn AN; Richardson TS; Handcock MS
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2010; 105(489):84-91. PubMed ID: 26640307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. New Findings on Unconsented Intimate Exams Suggest Racial Bias and Gender Parity.
    Bruce L; Hannikainen IR; Earp BD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Mar; 52(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 35476362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Understanding Policy Diffusion in the U.S.: An Information-Theoretical Approach to Unveil Connectivity Structures in Slowly Evolving Complex Systems.
    Anderson RP; Jimenez G; Bae JY; Silver D; Macinko J; Porfiri M
    SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst; 2016; 15(3):1384-1409. PubMed ID: 29075163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.
    BarberÁ P; Casas A; Nagler J; Egan PJ; Bonneau R; Jost JT; Tucker JA
    Am Polit Sci Rev; 2019 Jul; 113(4):883-901. PubMed ID: 33303996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Policy content analysis: Qualitative method for analyzing sub-national insect pollinator legislation.
    Hall DM; Steiner R
    MethodsX; 2020; 7():100787. PubMed ID: 32025507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Oil and gas companies invest in legislators that vote against the environment.
    Goldberg MH; Marlon JR; Wang X; van der Linden S; Leiserowitz A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(10):5111-5112. PubMed ID: 32094171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.